Imagine Wireless ATL · Rev 1 Baseline
Venue Network Intelligence Report · Rev 1 · First issue

Network baseline for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta across seven concourses and two terminals

Over the nine passenger-building footprints, the three carriers are close. Three buildings are ties, and each carrier leads at least one. At the gate areas, only AT&T's median 5G signal is healthy, on the smallest 5G footprint of the three (5G on 40% of its tiles). Each carrier's single lowest building is Concourse F or the International Terminal.

3 of 9
Passenger buildings are ties. AT&T leads Concourses C, D, E, and F. T-Mobile leads Concourse A. Verizon leads the International Terminal. Leaders are named from building readings only.
2
Buildings that hold each carrier's single lowest reading: the International Terminal for AT&T (49%) and T-Mobile (27%), and Concourse F for Verizon (36% of tiles healthy). Concourse F: AT&T 55%, T-Mobile 38%. International Terminal: Verizon 61%.
133 of 201
Gate points with healthy AT&T 5G. AT&T is the only carrier above the line there, though it reports 5G on only 40% of its tiles. T-Mobile has 31 and Verizon 12. The two are tied at the median only: Verizon is the weakest by more than 1 dB at 88 gate points, T-Mobile at 10. 59 gate points are weak for all three.
41.7%
Wi-Fi share of observed data on tiles in a concourse zone (n=26,630). 42.5% over the whole study area (n=44,155). Not attributable to any one Wi-Fi network.
Prepared by the Imagine Wireless Network Intelligence Platform · Powered by Ookla
201 gate points · 284 venue points · 44,634 unique tiles (85,763 carrier-tile observations) · 371 estimated site centroids · 12 months
Data window 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31 · Issued 2026-09-21 (rev 1) · Freshness 21 days at issue
Prepared for City of Atlanta Department of Aviation stakeholder review
Confidential
Summary

Executive summary

Buildings first · gate areas second · baseline purpose

Over the passenger-building footprints, the three carriers are close. Of the 9 buildings, 3 are ties. AT&T leads 4, T-Mobile leads Concourse A, and Verizon leads the International Terminal.

This report names a leader only from readings over the buildings. The data is a year of signal readings from Android phones, grouped into tiles: patches of ground about 9 m by 11 m. A tile is healthy when its 5G signal is at or above −95 dBm. The following table shows, for each building, the share of healthy tiles and the median 5G reading.

Building (OSM footprint)AT&TT-MobileVerizonVerdict
Domestic Terminal54% · −95.0n=35456% · −95.0n=44055% · −94.0n=378Three-way tie
Concourse T70% · −92.0n=20370% · −93.0n=25671% · −91.0n=217Two-way tie (AT&T, Verizon)
Concourse A81% · −91.0n=17787% · −89.0n=22271% · −91.0n=211T-Mobile leads
Concourse B72% · −91.0n=18174% · −92.0n=22871% · −91.5n=208Three-way tie
Concourse C89% · −87.0n=16680% · −92.0n=21165% · −91.5n=196AT&T leads
Concourse D87% · −88.0n=11960% · −93.0n=15077% · −90.5n=142AT&T leads
Concourse E69% · −92.0n=33950% · −95.0n=46453% · −95.0n=379AT&T leads
Concourse F55% · −94.0n=15738% · −97.0n=21736% · −99.0n=166AT&T leads
International Terminal49% · −96.0n=4927% · −97.0n=6061% · −93.0n=59Verizon leads

Each cell: share of tiles with healthy 5G (at or above −95 dBm) · median 5G RSRP in dBm · n = tiles over the footprint. Leader rule (section 4.7): a carrier leads a building only when it is alone at the top on both measures. It must top the healthy share by more than 1 point and the median by more than 1 dB. Otherwise every carrier within those margins of the top on either measure is tied. The rule runs on the unrounded values.

The international side is the weakest place measured. Each carrier's single lowest building is one of two: the International Terminal for AT&T (49%) and T-Mobile (27%), and Concourse F for Verizon (36%). Every carrier is healthy on more than half the tiles over 7 of the 9 buildings.

  1. At the gate areas, only AT&T clears the healthy 5G line

    AT&T is healthy at 133 of 201 gate points, on the smallest 5G footprint of the three (5G on 40% of its tiles). T-Mobile (31) and Verizon (12) sit below the line. The two are tied at the median only: Verizon is the weakest carrier by more than 1 dB at 88 gate points, T-Mobile at 10. 59 gate points are weak for all three carriers.

    A gate area is the ground within 80 m of a gate. At the median gate, only 22.4% of that ground lies over a building footprint. The rest is apron, the paved area where aircraft park. This report calls these readings apron-weighted: a gate-area number describes mostly the apron, not the seating area.

  2. The airport-owned neutral-host DAS was replaced inside the window

    The airport owns the distributed antenna system (DAS), an in-building system built to be shared by several carriers, called a neutral host. A fact tagged held comes from a source document pinned in this build and checksummed in the verification bundle.

    The Atlanta City Council approved a replacement DAS on May 19, 2025. T-Mobile and AT&T signed, with a January 2026 target date held.

    Verizon's participation in the new system, the integrator, and the per-building cutover dates are not held. This report has no source document for them.

  3. What this issue can and cannot evaluate

    This issue is a baseline. Its readings mix the old and new systems, so it cannot evaluate the new system on its own. No capital recommendation follows from this data alone (section 13).

Three asks

The in-building record, per building and per carrier (Recommendation 1).

A like-for-like re-measurement per building, starting with Concourse F and the International Terminal (Recommendations 2 and 3).

A walk test inside two piers, to measure the building-versus-apron gap this report can only infer (Recommendation 4).

Photo · Domestic Terminal ticketing and check-in hall, May 2023Wikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of the Domestic Terminal ticketing and check-in hall at Hartsfield-Jackson in May 2023, with overhead signage for the Main and North Checkpoints and check-in counters below

Domestic Terminal ticketing and check-in hall, with the Main and North Checkpoint signage, May 2023. Photo: Harrison Keely, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Section 1

Executive readout

Buildings first · then gate areas · then context

Each carrier's building readings come first, and its gate-area readings second. Buildings decide the leader. Gate areas are reported as counts and shares, never as a lead.

What a gate-area number is at ATL

Each gate figure aggregates the tiles within 80 m of a gate point. At ATL that circle reaches the apron on both sides of each pier.

The following table gives, per concourse, the median share of the gate area that lies over a building footprint. The highest at any gate is 68%. A gate-area figure is mostly an outdoor apron reading.

ConcourseTABCDEF
Share of the gate area over a building footprint (median)21.8%22.8%23.2%23.9%15.2%22.6%34.2%
Over the buildings: the leader basis

The following table lists the building verdicts and their margins (section 4.7). Every ranked cell clears the 30-tile floor.

BuildingVerdictTop share marginTop median margin
Domestic TerminalThree-way tie0 points1.0 dB
Concourse TTwo-way tie (AT&T, Verizon)1 point1.0 dB
Concourse AT-Mobile leads6 points2.0 dB
Concourse BThree-way tie2 points0.5 dB
Concourse CAT&T leads8 points4.5 dB
Concourse DAT&T leads11 points2.5 dB
Concourse EAT&T leads17 points3.0 dB
Concourse FAT&T leads17 points3.0 dB
International TerminalVerizon leads12 points3.0 dB

Healthy shares and medians per building are in the Executive summary table. Leader rule (section 4.7): a carrier leads a building only when it is alone at the top on both measures. It must top the healthy share by more than 1 point and the median by more than 1 dB. Otherwise every carrier within those margins of the top on either measure is tied. The rule runs on the unrounded values. Concourse B is a three-way tie because the top share and the top median belong to different carriers.

Carrier readings side by side
ReadingAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Over the building footprints
Buildings ledC, D, E, FConcourse AInternational Terminal
Highest building (healthy)Concourse C 89%Concourse A 87%Concourse D 77%
Lowest building (healthy)International Terminal 49%International Terminal 27%Concourse F 36%
At the gate areas (n=201 gate points)
5G median−93.4 dBm−96.7 dBm−97.6 dBm
Healthy 5G gate points133 (66.2%)31 (15.4%)12 (6.0%)
Within 1 dB of the line607234
At risk · critical68 · 0170 · 0189 · 0
Strongest 5G by more than 1 dB138110
Weakest 5G by more than 1 dB01088
5G SINR median · gate points healthy on SINR+15.2 dB · 197 of 201+9.5 dB · 76 of 201+10.8 dB · 132 of 201
LTE median · gate points healthy on LTE−92.4 dBm · 182 of 201−95.8 dBm · 68 of 201−96.4 dBm · 61 of 201
Strongest LTE reading17440
5G footprint (share of tiles)40%84%70%

Strongest and weakest counts: 52 gate points tie at the top and 103 tie at the bottom. The 5G footprint mixes deployment with the panel's handset mix, so it is not compared across carriers (section 16).

AT&T

AT&T leads over 4 of 9 buildings. Its lowest building is the International Terminal, at 49% of tiles healthy.

At the gate areas it is the only carrier above the healthy line. It is 3.3 dB ahead of T-Mobile and 4.2 dB ahead of Verizon, both above the 1 dB noise floor. It reports 5G on only 40% of its tiles, and 17% of its tiles are 5G present and healthy, against T-Mobile 34% and Verizon 27% (section 3.0). Its LTE layer is the strongest of the three.

T-Mobile

T-Mobile leads over Concourse A and ties over the Domestic Terminal and Concourse B. Its lowest building is the International Terminal, at 27%.

At the gate areas it is 1.7 dB below the healthy line. Its median is 0.9 dB from Verizon's, inside the noise floor, so the two are tied at the median. Per gate point, Verizon is the weakest by more than 1 dB at 88 and T-Mobile at 10. 8 of its 11 strongest gate points are in Concourse A. Its SINR median is the lowest of the three. Its LTE median (−95.8 dBm) is below the line and 0.6 dB from Verizon's, a tie.

Verizon

Verizon leads over the International Terminal and ties over the Domestic Terminal, Concourse T and Concourse B. Its lowest building is Concourse F, at 36%.

At the gate areas it is 2.6 dB below the line and healthy at the fewest points. Its LTE median (−96.4 dBm) is below the line, tied with T-Mobile's. Its 5G is NR3700 on 63% of its 9,964 band-reporting 5G tiles. NR3700 is Ookla's label for 5G on spectrum near 3700 MHz, the mid-band called C-band (section 9.1).

Per terminal complex (gate-area counts)
ComplexGate pointsAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Domestic Terminal complex (T, A, B, C, D)157−92.9 · 113 (72%)−96.2 · 31 (20%)−97.4 · 11 (7%)
International Terminal complex (E, F)44−95.3 · 20 (45%)−97.5 · 0 (0%)−98.0 · 1 (2%)

Each cell: gate-area 5G median in dBm · healthy 5G gate points (share).

How the order holds

At the gate median, AT&T is first by 3.3 dB over T-Mobile and 4.2 dB over Verizon. Both margins clear the 1 dB noise floor (section 16).

T-Mobile and Verizon are 0.9 dB apart at the median, under the floor, so this report does not rank one above the other there. The tie is at the median only. Per gate point, Verizon is the weakest by more than 1 dB at 88 and T-Mobile at 10. T-Mobile is listed first only because its median is numerically higher.

Only AT&T's median sits above the −95 dBm line. The order reproduces from the tile export alone.

The in-building record and what it does not settle

The airport-owned neutral-host DAS was first commissioned in 2010. It has more than 700 antennas across the terminal, atrium, concourses and the underground transportation mall, plus a separate public-safety layer held.

On May 19, 2025 the Atlanta City Council approved carrier agreements for a replacement DAS. T-Mobile and AT&T signed, and the airport scheduled completion for January 2026, inside this window held. The airport states the new system covers the passenger facility from curbside to gate held.

Verizon's participation in the new system is not held. Verizon is not named in the 2025 release, and it was on the 2010 system.

Ookla's Site Finder estimates where each serving node sits from the same crowdsourced tiles. Each estimated position is a site centroid. It places centroids within the building footprints for all three carriers (the following table). These are estimates, not a registry. A centroid within a 60 m wide pier is consistent with a node in that pier, not a macro site.

The centroids do not show whose in-building system serves each carrier. The open questions are which carriers the new system carries, which bands and power each carrier's in-building layer carries, and whether its 5G rides on it. Section 8 lists what the record does not hold. Recommendation 1 asks for it.

Site Finder centroids within the building footprintsAT&TT-MobileVerizon
LTE (of on-airport)40 of 6112 of 2331 of 67
5G (of on-airport)9 of 3328 of 5529 of 59
What the pattern is consistent with (inference)

Band first. AT&T's strongest 5G band is NR3700 on 47% of its 2,223 band-reporting 5G tiles, plus NR3500 on another 25%. That is the highest-frequency mix of the three. NR3700 and NR3500 are C-band, 5G mid-band spectrum near 3700 and 3500 MHz.

T-Mobile's is NR2500 on 55% of 26,021. Verizon's is NR3700 on 63% of 9,964. Weak inference: a C-band signal that reads 3.3 dB stronger than a 2.5 GHz signal at the same gate point is consistent with a nearer source. The sample is thin. Only 2,223 of AT&T's 10,316 5G tiles report a band, and 26.2% of those are NR850.

Over the buildings the carriers separate by building, not by carrier. A multi-carrier in-building system with uneven per-carrier loading produces that pattern. So does pier geometry acting on macro signals. Concourse C is the sharpest case (section 4.5).

The export cannot separate the two, and this report does not state that any carrier's reading comes from any in-building system.

Limits of every ranking in this report

Every ranking is signal-layer: RSRP and signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) from an Android crowdsource panel. The export has no throughput or latency. It measures where signal is, not whether a call or app fails.

The panel differs by carrier and is Android-only. Handset vintage decides which devices can report which 5G band. Nothing is measured indoors. Gate and tenant values are tiles within 80 m of a point (section 16).

External benchmark, engaged with up front

Ookla's December 2025 article on the 50 busiest United States airports (Speedtest Intelligence, first half of 2025) named Hartsfield-Jackson one of five airports where airport Wi-Fi posted a higher median download speed than any mobile provider. Its per-provider figures are public record, cited without a held copy not independently verified.

That is not in tension with this report. The article measures throughput. This report measures signal level and quality, and carries no throughput or latency field. A strong signal can be congested, and a weak signal can be fast when few devices share it.

Venue context

Hartsfield-Jackson is operated by the City of Atlanta Department of Aviation held. Two terminal complexes are in service.

ElementWhat the record holds
Domestic TerminalNorth and South halves, with the MARTA Airport Station between the two baggage-claim halls. Feeds Concourses T, A, B, C and D. The fact sheet publishes 155 domestic gates held
Maynard H. Jackson Jr. International TerminalOpened in 2012. Concourse F (gates F1 to F14 on the official 2012 map) is attached; Concourse E is reached through the E-F connector. The fact sheet publishes 43 international gates held
Plane TrainUnderground automated people mover linking all seven concourses with both terminals. A 3-mile loop, eleven four-car trains about every two minutes, more than 200,000 riders a day held
Concourse D wideningA $1.4 billion program, 2024 to 2029, widening the concourse from 60 to 90 feet. Five new gates opened September 17, 2025 and three more June 4, 2026, both inside this window. Sections were closed for construction throughout held

This report measures 201 gate points, 284 mapped venue points, 44,634 unique tiles (85,763 carrier-tile observations, one per carrier per tile), 44,155 usage tiles and 371 estimated site centroids over the 12 months ending 2026-08-31.

This issue cannot evaluate the replacement DAS. The export is a single 12-month aggregate with no date split, and the per-building cutover dates are not held. The date-range comparison in section 15 is the instrument for that question.

Provenance legend

Measured values compute from the Ookla exports at build time. held facts come from a source document pinned and checksummed in this build. not independently verified facts are public record cited without a held copy.

The Imagine knowledge-graph snapshot is pinned in this build and quoted inline as "Imagine knowledge graph". Its leadership rows are held and no name is printed. Section 16 defines every threshold and basis.

Section 2

Venue snapshot and asset inventory

Operator · gate points · in-building record

ATL is two terminal complexes, seven concourses and nine passenger buildings. This section lists what was measured and what the public record holds.

ElementValueNotes
Airport / IATA / ICAOHartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport / ATL / KATLFAA large hub, rank 1 by calendar-2024 enplanements held. 106,302,208 total passengers in 2025 (91,437,847 domestic, 14,864,361 international), -1.6% versus 2024, and 805,268 aircraft operations held. Passengers count both directions, a different basis from the FAA enplanement figure in section 12.
Operating authorityCity of Atlanta Department of AviationA municipal department. Carrier agreements, airport contracts and capital appropriations go to the Atlanta City Council, then the Mayor held
Terminal complexes analyzed2Domestic Terminal: Delta and Delta Connection on Concourses A, B, C and D; American, United, Southwest, JetBlue, Frontier, Alaska and others on T and C. 155 domestic gates published.
International Terminal: Delta long-haul and foreign-flag carriers on Concourse F; Concourse E serves international and domestic flights. 43 international gates published all held
Zones for tile assignment7Concourses T, A, B, C, D (Domestic Terminal complex) and E, F (International Terminal complex). A tile goes to the nearest gate or tenant point within 500 m.
Passenger buildings (mask)9Domestic Terminal, Concourses T, A, B, C, D, E, F, and the International Terminal. Pinned OpenStreetMap footprints; the leader basis (section 4.7).
Gate points analyzed201T 21 · A 29 · B 32 · C 34 · D 41 · E 32 · F 12. OpenStreetMap inventory pinned 2026-09-21, zoned by the concourse letter in the gate ref; 180 of 201 sit within a footprint. Reconciled with the published list in section 2.1.
Mapped venue points284106 food · 47 retail · 42 transport_admin · 33 services · 21 admin · 19 other · 16 lounge.
By zone: T 68 · A 25 · B 26 · C 22 · D 28 · E 24 · F 42 · outside zones 49.
Google Places and OpenStreetMap capture, pinned 2026-09-21 points only. 299 points were captured; 15 were excluded as non-venue points (museum aircraft, vending machines, a hangar, private terminals and similar). 48 were refiled where the category contradicted the function, 4 of them lounges. Every call is listed in the audit dossier.
Carriers measured3AT&T · T-Mobile · Verizon. 44,634 unique tiles (85,763 carrier-tile observations); 44,155 All Networks usage tiles; 181 LTE and 190 5G estimated site centroids.
In-building cellularAirport-owned neutral-host DAS, first commissioned in 2010, replaced inside the windowMore than 700 antennas across the terminal, atrium, concourses and the underground transportation mall, plus a public-safety layer.
May 19, 2025: Council approved carrier agreements for a replacement DAS. T-Mobile and AT&T signed. Completion scheduled for January 2026, so the window blends the legacy and new systems. Verizon's participation in the new system is not held.
The airport states the new system covers curbside to gate across all concourses and both terminals, moves from 4G to 5G service, and upgrades public-safety radio distribution all held. What the record does not hold is listed once, in section 8.
Knowledge-graph coverageProfile, two DAS deployment rows, financial-report and budget evidence, seven leadership rows (names withheld)The Airport DAS Master (2026-07-28) records ATL as DAS: yes, self-owned, neutral host, operator unknown, integrator Johnson Controls, term 2018 to 2022. A field note records a 50 million dollar project installed by Johnson Controls and SMS.
A 2025 neutral-host DAS row carries no vendor. The FY2025 financial report names a Distributed Antenna System Upgrade with no dollar figure. The FY2026 budget book has no DAS, Wi-Fi or cellular line.
Airport Wi-Fi is recorded as airport-owned and run in house Imagine knowledge graph. The graph's enplanement count carries no year and is not published.
Public Wi-FiSSID ATL Free Wi-FiRun by the airport on its own network. Launched free in June 2014 with several hundred access points, at a City-approved cost of $5,622,249. No third-party concessionaire was found; the current equipment generation is not held held. The airport publishes no Wi-Fi usage figure.
Capital programATLNext, a 20-year program, with a new master plan toward 160 million annual passengersThe $1.4 billion Concourse D widening (2024 to 2029), the largest ATLNext project. Plane Train fleet renewal and a five-year operation and maintenance procurement, approved March 16, 2026. The $440 million South Red Deck (more than 7,000 spaces) opened June 1, 2026, inside this window held
Ground transportPlane Train, ATL SkyTrain, MARTA Airport StationPlane Train: eleven four-car trains on a 3-mile underground loop, about every two minutes, more than 200,000 riders a day. SkyTrain runs landside to the Rental Car Center. Context only not independently verified
RecognitionWorld's busiest airport by total passengers in 2025 (Airports Council International)Top spot in 27 of the last 28 years. Best Airport over 40 million passengers in North America in the 2023 and 2024 Airport Service Quality awards, not among 2025 winners. 15th of 20 mega airports in the J.D. Power 2026 study, at 606 of 1,000. Context only not independently verified
Photo · Aerial view over the airfield, May 2026Wikimedia Commons
Aerial photograph over the Hartsfield-Jackson airfield in May 2026, taken from an aircraft window, with runways, taxiways and terminal buildings visible below; individual concourses are not distinguishable

Aerial view over the airfield, May 2026. Illustrative only. Individual concourses are not distinguishable in this frame. Photo: Zixed11, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Fig. 1 · Venue map · aerodrome, nine OSM passenger buildings, 201 gate pointsSource · Ookla
Map of the ATL aerodrome outline with the nine OpenStreetMap passenger buildings: the Domestic Terminal to the west feeding Concourse T, the parallel north-south piers A to F in walking order east, and the International Terminal attached to Concourse F; gate points dot the piers with a concourse letter at each, and the on-airport RF tile centroids form a dot field over the apron, taxiways and roadways; north up with a scale bar in meters

FIG. 1. Venue map: aerodrome outline, the nine OpenStreetMap passenger buildings, 201 gate points with concourse letters, and the on-airport tile centroids (85,763 carrier-tile observations). North up, scale bar in meters. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Photo · Plane Train in-car display, December 2023Wikimedia Commons
Photograph inside a Plane Train car in December 2023, with the in-car display listing the concourse sequence F, E, D, C, B, A, T

Plane Train in-car display with the concourse sequence F, E, D, C, B, A, T, December 2023. The train runs below the concourses through the transportation mall, which the airport-owned DAS has covered since 2010. Photo: DiscoA340, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

2.1 Measured gate inventory against the published gate list

The analysis uses 201 measured points. The airport fact sheet publishes 198 gates (155 domestic, 43 international) with no per-concourse count held.

A per-concourse list is held only for Concourse F, from the official 2012 map (F1 to F14). There, 2 published gates have no measured point, and every measured point is on the list.

Per-concourse counts are measured points

Every per-concourse count in this report is a count of MEASURED points. The Concourse D widening adds and retires gate positions through 2029, so its count blends construction phases.

Aligning the OpenStreetMap inventory with the Department of Aviation's gate plan is a request in section 15. No gate-named criterion in section 14 should be adopted before that is done.

ConcoursePublished gatesMeasured pointsPublished but not measuredMeasured but not on the published list
Concourse Tnot held per concourse21n/an/a
Concourse Anot held per concourse29n/an/a
Concourse Bnot held per concourse32n/an/a
Concourse Cnot held per concourse34n/an/a
Concourse Dnot held per concourse41n/an/a
Concourse Enot held per concourse32n/an/a
Concourse F1412F11, F13none
Whole campus (fact sheet)198201n/an/a
Download the full report (PDF · rev 1)
Section 3

Carrier findings

Summary · per carrier · band, quality, churn
How to read the measurement

Every cellular number here aggregates crowdsourced background scans from consumer Android devices (about 3% of handsets). iOS is not sampled. Ookla bins them to map tiles of about 9 m by 11 m, then they are joined to gate and tenant points.

The numbers describe where devices were over 12 months. They are not drive-test measurements. Every n counts tiles, and every table carries its n.

3.0 Carrier summary

At the gate points, AT&T is the only carrier above the healthy 5G line. T-Mobile and Verizon are tied below it at the median only. Per gate point, Verizon is the weakest by more than 1 dB at 88 and T-Mobile at 10.

Carrier5G RSRP median5G SINR medianLTE RSRP medianHealthy 5G gate pointsn (gate points / RF tiles)
AT&T−93.4 dBm+15.2 dB−92.4 dBm133 of 201201 / 25,823
T-Mobile−96.7 dBm+9.5 dB−95.8 dBm31 of 201201 / 32,992
Verizon−97.6 dBm+10.8 dB−96.4 dBm12 of 201201 / 26,948

Healthy = gate mean at or above −95 dBm. SINR healthy gate points: AT&T 197, T-Mobile 76, Verizon 132 of 201. LTE healthy gate points: AT&T 182, T-Mobile 68, Verizon 61. Strongest LTE reading: AT&T 174, T-Mobile 4, Verizon 0 gate points.

Over all on-airport tiles the picture changes. Each 5G median below counts only tiles that report 5G. The last column combines presence and level.

Carrier5G footprint (% of tiles)5G RSRP median over reporting tilesLTE RSRP medianLTE-only tiles5G present and healthy (% of all tiles)n (tiles)
AT&T40%−98.0 dBm−96.0 dBm58%17%25,823
T-Mobile84%−97.0 dBm−98.0 dBm14%34%32,992
Verizon70%−98.0 dBm−98.0 dBm28%27%26,948
How to read the two tables together

Over all tiles, the three 5G medians sit inside the noise floor. On 5G present and healthy, the order differs from the gate-point order.

A carrier whose handsets hold 5G only where it is strong gives a censored 5G median. At the gate points the per-gate 5G tile n is comparable (median per gate AT&T 163, T-Mobile 180, Verizon 170 tiles, Appendix C).

Every carrier reads stronger at the gate points than campus-wide, because the gate area sits on the apron edge of the piers. Cross-carrier 5G statements are read with the footprint share beside them and the building basis (section 4.7) as the verdict.

Fig. 2 · Venue medians across 201 gate points · locked threshold ladderSource · Ookla
Bar panels of the venue median 5G RSRP, 5G SINR and LTE RSRP per carrier against the healthy, at-risk and critical threshold lines; only AT&T's 5G bar reaches past the healthy line, while T-Mobile and Verizon stop short of it

FIG. 2. Venue medians across 201 gate points against the locked threshold ladder (section 16). The two received-power panels draw bars from −115 dBm, so a longer bar is a stronger signal. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Fig. 3 · SINR distribution per carrier at gate-point levelSource · Ookla
Distribution of per-gate-point 5G SINR for each carrier with the healthy line; AT&T sits highest and T-Mobile lowest, on different band mixes

FIG. 3. SINR distribution per carrier at gate-point level. Read across carriers with care. SINR depends on the serving band's bandwidth and on neighbor loading. These carriers sit on different bands here (section 9.1 gives each carrier's strongest-serving band mix). So a cross-carrier SINR gap is not a like-for-like comparison. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Cross-carrier SINR, stated once and applied throughout

The three carriers are not on the same spectrum at this venue (section 9.1). A carrier mostly on sub-1 GHz 5G will not produce an SINR distribution comparable to one mostly on mid-band.

Within a carrier, SINR across zones is a fair comparison. Across carriers it is context, not a ranking.

Fig. 4 · 5G NR RSRP by tile and carrier · locked coverage classSource · Ookla
Three tile maps of the ATL terminal and concourse area, one per carrier, each tile colored healthy green, at-risk amber or critical red by 5G RSRP with grey for no 5G reading and the building footprints outlined; green runs along the piers, amber fills the apron between them and covers Concourse F and the International Terminal at the east end, and AT&T's panel has more grey tiles because it reports 5G on fewer tiles

FIG. 4. Terminal and concourse area map of 5G NR RSRP by tile and carrier, colored by the locked coverage class. Grey tiles carry no 5G reading. Each tile is about 9 m by 11 m, and n is the tile count per panel. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

What each carrier's readings show
What the AT&T readings show

AT&T leads over Concourses C, D, E and F. At the gate areas it is the only carrier above the healthy line (133 of 201 gate points), with the strongest LTE layer (174 of 201, median −92.4 dBm).

Its lowest building is the International Terminal (49% healthy, median −96.0 dBm). So the international side is where a re-measurement would show the largest change for AT&T too.

Site Finder places 40 AT&T LTE and 9 AT&T 5G estimated nodes within the building footprints (section 9.3). Its 40% 5G footprint is not read as coverage, because the panel's handset mix confounds it.

What the T-Mobile readings show

T-Mobile's strongest building is Concourse A (87% healthy). Its weakest is the International Terminal (27%, median −97.0 dBm).

At the gate areas it is tied with Verizon at the median, below the healthy line, and healthy at 31 of 201 gate points. It is the weakest by more than 1 dB at 10 gate points, against Verizon's 88. Its 5G SINR median (+9.5 dB) is the lowest, on a different band mix.

Site Finder places 28 T-Mobile 5G nodes within the building footprints, the most of the three, and only 12 LTE nodes (section 9.3). Estimated 5G nodes over the buildings plus a below-line gate-area median make T-Mobile the clearest case for a walk test of what those nodes carry and at what power.

What the Verizon readings show

Verizon's strongest building is Concourse D (77% healthy). Its weakest is Concourse F (36%, median −99.0 dBm).

At the gate areas it is tied with T-Mobile at the median only, below the line, and healthy at the fewest gate points (12 of 201). It is the weakest carrier by more than 1 dB at 88 of 201 gate points, against T-Mobile's 10.

Site Finder places 31 Verizon LTE and 29 Verizon 5G nodes within the building footprints (section 9.3). The question is the same as T-Mobile's, plus one: whether Verizon is on the new DAS at all, which the record does not hold.

Healthy 5G share by concourse zone (tile basis)

Zones include apron, taxiway and roadway as well as building, so this table is not a leader board. Building shares are in the Executive summary table. That is why Verizon's highest zone is Concourse F (57%) while its lowest building is Concourse F (36%): the zone adds the apron around the pier.

ZoneAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Concourse T52%41%33%
Concourse A49%36%32%
Concourse B50%31%31%
Concourse C59%36%31%
Concourse D55%29%25%
Concourse E52%29%29%
Concourse F36%42%57%
Minimum n per zone (tiles)3871,5141,259
3.1 AT&T results

AT&T is first at the 5G gate median, 3.3 dB ahead of T-Mobile, and the only carrier above the line. It is healthy at 133 of 201 gate points, at risk at 68, critical at 0.

It is the strongest 5G reading by more than 1 dB at 138 of 201 gate points. That includes every gate point in Concourses C and D (counts).

Strongest 5G by more than 1 dB (counts)TABCDEF
Measured gate points21293234413212
AT&T105243441204
T-Mobile1800002
Verizon0000000

52 of the 201 gate points are ties within the 1 dB floor.

Its 5G reports on 40% of its on-airport tiles (10,316 of 25,823). Tiles with LTE but no 5G are 58% of its tiles. Its 5G is NR3700 on 47% of its 2,223 band-reporting 5G tiles. NR3700 is Ookla's label for 5G near 3700 MHz, the C-band mid-band.

Its zone shares run from 59% in Concourse C to 36% in Concourse F. FIG. 4 shows green along the piers from Concourse B eastward and amber over Concourse F and the International Terminal. Its terminal-vs-periphery proxy is −1.0 dB, inside the 1 dB noise floor, so it reads as no difference (section 5.2).

AT&T is the weakest carrier by more than 1 dB at 0 of 201 gate points. 103 points tie at the bottom.

3.2 T-Mobile results

T-Mobile's 5G gate median is −96.7 dBm, below the healthy line. It is tied with Verizon at the median (0.9 dB apart) and 3.3 dB behind AT&T. It is healthy at 31 of 201 gate points, at risk at 170, critical at 0.

It reports 5G on 84% of its on-airport tiles (27,860 of 32,992), the widest footprint. Its 5G is NR2500 on 55% of its 26,021 band-reporting 5G tiles. That mid-band layer reads weaker than sub-1 GHz at the same distance.

Its LTE median is −95.8 dBm, below the line and tied with Verizon's (0.6 dB apart). It is healthy on LTE at 68 of 201 gate points and strongest at 4. Its zone shares run from 42% in Concourse F to 29% in Concourses D and E, a tie within 1 point. It leads over Concourse A (section 4.7). Its terminal-vs-periphery proxy is +1.0 dB, inside the noise floor, so it reads as no difference (section 5.2).

T-Mobile is the weakest carrier by more than 1 dB at 10 of 201 gate points.

3.3 Verizon results

Verizon's 5G gate median is −97.6 dBm, tied with T-Mobile at the median and 4.2 dB behind AT&T. It is healthy at 12 of 201 gate points, the fewest of the three, at risk at 189, critical at 0.

It reports 5G on 70% of its on-airport tiles (18,800 of 26,948). Its 5G is NR3700 on 63% of its 9,964 band-reporting 5G tiles. Its LTE median is −96.4 dBm, below the line and tied with T-Mobile's. It is healthy on LTE at 61 of 201 gate points.

Its zone shares run from 57% in Concourse F to 25% in Concourse D. It leads over the International Terminal (section 4.7). Its terminal-vs-periphery proxy is +2.0 dB (section 5.2).

Verizon is the weakest carrier by more than 1 dB at 88 of 201 gate points, the most of the three.

3.4 5G footprint and coverage-band attachment
5G footprint share is confounded

AT&T reports 5G on 40% of its tiles, T-Mobile 84%, Verizon 70%. A tile reports 5G only if a panel handset could report that carrier's 5G band. So the share mixes deployment with the handset mix.

It is not a coverage measurement, it is not compared across carriers, and it is not charted on a shared axis (section 16).

Fig. 5 · LTE percent-low-band per carrier · mean, share above zero, p90Source · Ookla
Figure of LTE percent-low-band per carrier showing the mean, the share of tiles above zero and the p90; AT&T carries the highest mean, Verizon is close behind, and T-Mobile sits near zero on every statistic

FIG. 5. LTE percent-low-band per carrier: mean, share of tiles above zero, and p90. Higher means more attachment to sub-1 GHz coverage bands. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Percent-low-band describes LTE attachment to sub-1 GHz, a coverage-grade band. Propagation, idle-mode priorities and site geometry all drive it.

CarrierLTE low-band meanTiles above zerop90n (tiles)5G low bandShare of band-reporting NR tiles
AT&T9.4%39%32%25,183NR850 on 582 tiles26.2% of 2,223
T-Mobile1.6%8%0%32,567NR600 on 2,376 tiles9.1% of 26,021
Verizon6.9%27%33%26,419NR850 on 1,095 tiles11.0% of 9,964

Section 9.1 lists the bands.

3.5 RSRQ, channel quality (CQI), and optimization priority
Fig. 6 · 5G NR and LTE RSRQ distributions per carrierSource · Ookla
Distributions of 5G NR and LTE reference signal received quality per carrier with a dotted generic reference line; every carrier's median sits below the reference line on both technologies

FIG. 6. 5G NR and LTE reference signal received quality (RSRQ) distributions per carrier. The dotted line is a GENERIC industry reference, not a threshold specified for this venue. Medians in this range are ordinary for a loaded network, and this is not a failure call. Read with SINR. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Fig. 7 · LTE CQI distribution and Ookla LTE optimization prioritySource · Ookla
Two panels per carrier: the LTE channel quality indicator distribution and the distribution of Ookla's LTE optimization priority index; the three carriers' medians sit close together, and the differences are in the tails

FIG. 7. LTE channel quality indicator (CQI) distribution and Ookla's LTE optimization priority index (vendor layer). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

CarrierRSRQ median NR / LTECQI median (n)LTE optimization priority median (n)
AT&T−12.0 / −13.0 dB8.0 (6,261)62 (22,026)
T-Mobile−12.0 / −12.0 dB9.0 (7,420)61 (16,924)
Verizon−11.0 / −12.0 dB9.0 (7,254)61 (21,171)

Every carrier's RSRQ median sits below the -10 dB line on both technologies. Medians of −11 to −14 dB are ordinary on a loaded network, and the line is a generic reference, so this is not a failure call.

RSRQ degrades as load rises, so weak RSRQ on strong RSRP is consistent with a loaded serving layer. That is an inference. The export carries no load field (section 16).

CQI is the closest throughput proxy in this export. Ookla's optimization priority flags tiles where signal is strong but quality is poor. The medians are close. The signal is in the distribution tails.

3.6 Serving-cell volatility (handover-churn proxy)
Fig. 8 · Serving-cell volatility per carrier, LTE and 5GSource · Ookla
Bar chart per carrier of the share of tiles where the strongest observed cell differs from the most-frequent serving cell, for LTE and 5G; T-Mobile's 5G bar is the highest and AT&T's 5G bar the lowest

FIG. 8. Share of tiles where the strongest observed cell differs from the most-frequent serving cell. Proxy for handover instability and dominance conflict. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Where the strongest cell is not the most-frequent serving cell, the network is handing over between competing cells.

CarrierLTE churn (n)5G churn (n)
AT&T41% (24,709)18% (2,223)
T-Mobile35% (21,412)39% (26,016)
Verizon35% (23,371)20% (9,964)

Cell fields populate only where Ookla resolved a serving cell, so these n are smaller than the RSRP n (section 16). Churn blends macro-sector overlap with any in-building system's hand-off to the macro layer. The export carries no handover trace.

Section 4

The view by concourse zone

Seven concourses · nine buildings

This section compares the three carriers concourse by concourse. The zone figures show the spread within each concourse area. Leaders are named only in section 4.7, over the building footprints.

What a concourse zone is

A tile belongs to the zone of its nearest gate or tenant point within 500 m. That gives hundreds of tiles per carrier per zone, but the pool holds apron, taxiway and roadway as well as building.

Zones are the seven concourses: T, A, B, C and D on the domestic side, E and F on the international side. The Concourse T zone also holds the Domestic Terminal landside (the parking decks, the economy lots and the MARTA station). It is the one zone that mixes a pier with the landside.

Gate points per concourse set how gate results are shown. Four concourses clear the 30-point floor, so their gate shares appear as percentages. The other three appear as counts only and are never ranked.

ConcourseGate points (n)Gate results shown as
Concourse T21Counts only
Concourse A29Counts only
Concourse B32Percentages
Concourse C34Percentages
Concourse D41Percentages
Concourse E32Percentages
Concourse F12Counts only
4.1 Healthy share and median RSRP by zone
These zone figures are not a leader board

Each zone pool includes apron, taxiway and roadway, so read the rows as the spread within a zone. Section 4.7 carries the only basis on which this report names a leader.

ZoneAT&T healthy tilesT-Mobile healthy tilesVerizon healthy tilesMedian 5G RSRP (dBm)
AT&T / T-Mobile / Verizon
Concourse T (DOM)52%n=2,51841%n=4,99533%n=3,403−95.0 / −97.0 / −99.0
Concourse A (DOM)49%n=61236%n=1,69632%n=1,535−96.0 / −98.0 / −100.0
Concourse B (DOM)50%n=53931%n=1,82931%n=1,554−96.0 / −100.0 / −100.0
Concourse C (DOM)59%n=38736%n=1,51431%n=1,259−93.0 / −99.0 / −100.0
Concourse D (DOM)55%n=44029%n=1,54825%n=1,361−94.0 / −99.0 / −102.0
Concourse E (INTL)52%n=84529%n=2,59529%n=2,068−95.0 / −99.0 / −100.0
Concourse F (INTL)36%n=1,10742%n=3,28357%n=1,895−99.0 / −97.0 / −93.0

Tile basis; n = tiles per carrier per zone. Healthy = tile 5G RSRP ≥ −95 dBm.

The carrier-to-carrier gap in healthy tile share is widest in Concourse D, at 30 points. It is narrowest in Concourse A, at 17 points. Each carrier's lowest zone is different:

36%
AT&T lowest zone · Concourse F
29%
T-Mobile lowest zones · Concourse D and Concourse E, tied
25%
Verizon lowest zone · Concourse D

A zone and a building can point in opposite directions. Verizon's Concourse F zone is its best zone (57% of 1,895 tiles healthy), yet the Concourse F building is its lowest building (36% of 166 tiles). The zone pool is mostly apron, taxiway and roadway outside the pier, so section 4.7 governs any reading of the building.

Fig. 9 · Healthy 5G tile share by zone and carrierSource · Ookla
Grouped bar chart of the share of zone tiles with healthy 5G RSRP for each carrier across the seven concourse zones, with the minimum n per carrier on the axis; AT&T's bar is the tallest in every zone except Concourse F, where Verizon's is

FIG. 9. Share of zone tiles with healthy 5G RSRP by carrier (tile basis; minimum n per carrier on the axis). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Fig. 10 · Median 5G RSRP by zone and carrierSource · Ookla
Grouped bar chart of the per-zone median 5G RSRP for each carrier on the tile basis against the healthy line across the seven concourse zones; T-Mobile and Verizon sit below the line in every domestic zone, and Verizon clears it only in Concourse F

FIG. 10. Per-zone median 5G RSRP per carrier (tile basis). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Fig. 11 · LTE RSRP by tile and carrier · terminal and concourse areaSource · Ookla
Three stacked tile maps of the terminal and concourse area for T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T, each tile colored by LTE RSRP coverage class with grey for no LTE reading; all three carriers show green along the pier interiors with amber on the apron, and AT&T's panel is the greenest across the piers and the Domestic Terminal

FIG. 11. Terminal and concourse area map of LTE RSRP by tile and carrier, colored by the locked coverage class. Grey tiles carry no LTE reading. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

4.2 Coverage class and PCI diversity

No gate point is critical for any carrier. Critical means 5G RSRP below −110 dBm, and the count is 0 of 201 for AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon. On the tile basis, a small critical share shows up in one zone per carrier:

CarrierCritical gate points (of 201)Highest critical tile shareZone
AT&T08%n=1,107Concourse F
T-Mobile04%n=1,829Concourse B
Verizon08%n=1,361Concourse D
Fig. 12 · Coverage-class distribution by concourse zone and carrierSource · Ookla
Stacked bar chart of healthy, at-risk and critical tile shares by concourse zone for each carrier, labelled A for AT&T, T for T-Mobile and V for Verizon; the at-risk band is the largest for T-Mobile and Verizon in every domestic zone, and the critical band is a thin strip everywhere

FIG. 12. Coverage-class distribution by concourse zone and carrier (tile basis; A = AT&T, T = T-Mobile, V = Verizon). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

PCI diversity counts the distinct cells (physical cell identities) that serve a zone, macro or in-building. Many cells with healthy SINR means several sectors serve the zone cleanly. Many cells with poor SINR means they compete.

PCI diversity is a prompt, not a ranking

Raw counts are not comparable across carriers, because the cell-resolved samples differ: AT&T 2,223, T-Mobile 26,016 and Verizon 9,964 tiles. That is why FIG. 13 draws the bars per 1,000 tiles.

Even normalized, the counts build up over 12 months across every 5G layer a carrier runs. Read a high value as a reason to check SINR in the same zone.

Fig. 13 · 5G PCI diversity per 1,000 cell-resolved tiles, by zone and carrierSource · Ookla
Grouped bar chart of unique strongest-serving 5G PCIs per 1,000 cell-resolved tiles for each carrier in the seven concourse zones, with the raw unique count in brackets above each bar; AT&T's normalized bar is the tallest in every zone, drawn from by far the smallest cell-resolved sample

FIG. 13. Unique strongest-serving physical cell identities (PCIs) per 1,000 cell-resolved tiles, per zone per carrier, with the raw unique count in brackets. Normalized because a unique count rises with sample size. Reads in both directions; always pair with SINR (section 16). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

4.3 Cross-carrier concordance by gate

A gate that is weak for all three carriers points to the area around that gate, which at this venue is mostly apron. A gate that is weak for one carrier points to that carrier's network.

8
Gate points healthy for all three carriers · of 201
18
Weak for one carrier · AT&T 0 · T-Mobile 4 · Verizon 14
116
Weak for two carriers · T-Mobile and Verizon 107 · AT&T and Verizon 9
59
Weak for all three · Concourse T 8 · A 14 · B 6 · D 7 · E 14 · F 10

Most weak gates are weak for two carriers or for all three. At the gate areas, T-Mobile and Verizon are below the healthy line almost everywhere. AT&T is the carrier that keeps the all-weak count from being higher.

Over the building footprints the picture is much closer, and the leader changes from building to building (section 4.7). So this concordance reads as an apron condition, not a building condition.

Fig. 14 · Carriers below the healthy line per gate point, by concourse zoneSource · Ookla
Stacked bar chart per concourse zone of gate points by how many of the three carriers fall below the healthy 5G line; the two-carriers-weak band dominates most concourses, the all-three-weak band covers most of Concourse F, and the all-healthy band is a thin sliver where it appears at all

FIG. 14. Per concourse zone: how many of the three carriers are below the healthy line at each gate point (gate counts). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

4.4 Concourses T and A

The Domestic Terminal is split into North and South halves, with the MARTA Airport Station between the two baggage-claim halls. It feeds Concourses T, A, B, C and D. The airport fact sheet publishes 155 domestic gates across the complex held.

How to read the concourse tables

The building row comes first because it is the only leader basis. Gate rows use the area within 80 m of each gate, which is mostly apron. Zone rows use the 500 m tile pool from section 4.1. Healthy = 5G RSRP ≥ −95 dBm. The leader rule from section 4.7 applies: a carrier leads a building only when it is alone at the top on both the healthy share, by more than 1 point, and the median, by more than 1 dB. Otherwise every carrier within those margins of the top on either measure is tied.

Concourse T hosts American, United and Delta, with other domestic carriers held. The airport places the Admirals Club across from gate T10, the United Club at T11 and a Delta Sky Club near gate T6. Per-airline gate assignments are not held.

Concourse TAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Over the building: healthy · median70% · −92.0 dBmn=20370% · −93.0 dBmn=25671% · −91.0 dBmn=217
Building verdictTwo-way tie (AT&T, Verizon); top share margin 1 point, top median margin 1.0 dB
Healthy gate points (count)12 of 213 of 212 of 21
Gate-area median 5G−94.8 dBm−96.0 dBm−97.4 dBm
Strongest 5G at a gate (count)AT&T 10 · tie within 1 dB 10 · T-Mobile 1
Zone tiles healthyspread 19 points52%41%33%

Concourse A hosts Delta Air Lines held, with Delta Sky Clubs at the Concourse A centerpoint and near gate A17.

Concourse AAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Over the building: healthy · median81% · −91.0 dBmn=17787% · −89.0 dBmn=22271% · −91.0 dBmn=211
Building verdictT-Mobile leads; share margin 6 points, median margin 2.0 dB
Healthy gate points (count)7 of 2912 of 290 of 29
Gate-area median 5G−95.3 dBm−95.2 dBm−96.6 dBm
Strongest 5G at a gate (count)Tie within 1 dB 16 · T-Mobile 8 · AT&T 5
Zone tiles healthyspread 17 points49%36%32%
Fig. 15 · Per-gate 5G RSRP · 50 Concourse T and A gate pointsSource · Ookla
Per-gate mean 5G RSRP bars for the 50 Concourse T and A gate points across three carriers with the healthy line; AT&T clears the line at more Concourse T gates than the other two, and across Concourse A the three carriers interleave close to the line

FIG. 15. Per-gate 5G RSRP across the 50 Concourse T and A gate points (OpenStreetMap inventory). Each bar is a mean over the tiles within 80 m of the gate. Bars rise from −115 dBm, so a longer bar is a stronger signal. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Photo · Concourse T at gate T10Wikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of the Concourse T corridor at gate T10 in December 2023, with gate seating, overhead signage and the corridor running toward the concourse end

Concourse T corridor at gate T10, December 2023. Photo: DiscoA340, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Photo · Concourse A at gate A19Wikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of Concourse A at gate A19 in December 2023, looking along the concourse corridor with gate hold-room seating, overhead signage and shopfronts

Concourse A at gate A19, December 2023. Photo: DiscoA340, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

4.5 Concourses B and C

Concourse B hosts Delta Air Lines held, with a Delta Sky Club near gate B18.

Concourse BAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Over the building: healthy · median72% · −91.0 dBmn=18174% · −92.0 dBmn=22871% · −91.5 dBmn=208
Building verdictThree-way tie (AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon); top share margin 2 points, top median margin 0.5 dB
Healthy gate points26 of 32 (81%)3 of 32 (9%)3 of 32 (9%)
Gate-area median 5G−93.3 dBm−97.2 dBm−97.5 dBm
Strongest 5G at a gate (count)AT&T 24 · tie within 1 dB 8
Zone tiles healthyspread 19 points50%31%31%

Concourse C hosts Delta Connection and Southwest Airlines held, with a Delta Sky Club near gate C37.

Concourse CAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Over the building: healthy · median89% · −87.0 dBmn=16680% · −92.0 dBmn=21165% · −91.5 dBmn=196
Building verdictAT&T leads; share margin 8 points, median margin 4.5 dB
Healthy gate points34 of 34 (100%)12 of 34 (35%)6 of 34 (18%)
Gate-area median 5G−90.5 dBm−95.4 dBm−96.7 dBm
Strongest 5G at a gate (count)AT&T 34
Zone tiles healthyspread 28 points59%36%31%

Spirit Airlines held gates C4 and C6 until it ceased operations on May 2, 2026, inside this window. Delta bid for those gates in July 2026 held. Whether that assignment closed inside the window is not held.

Concourse C has the sharpest carrier split on the campus

At 18 of its 34 gate points, AT&T reads 5 dB or more above both other carriers: C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C9, C10, C12, C13, C14, C15, C16, C17, C42, C47 and C55. AT&T signal quality there runs +13.1 to +20.5 dB, and 13 of the top 20 asymmetry gate points in section 10 are in Concourse C.

C-band is the mid-band 5G spectrum that the NR3700 band carries (section 9.1). On C-band, a margin that size over one stretch of pier is consistent with a dedicated nearby source rather than a macro sector. This is a weak inference, because only 2,223 AT&T tiles report a 5G band. Which system it belongs to is not held. It is the first stop for the walk test in Recommendation 4, and this report draws no further conclusion.

Fig. 16 · Per-gate 5G RSRP · 66 Concourse B and C gate pointsSource · Ookla
Per-gate mean 5G RSRP bars for the 66 Concourse B and C gate points across three carriers with the healthy line; AT&T clears the line across most of Concourse B and all of Concourse C, while T-Mobile and Verizon sit below it at most gates

FIG. 16. Per-gate 5G RSRP across the 66 Concourse B and C gate points (OpenStreetMap inventory). Each bar is a mean over the tiles within 80 m of the gate. Bars rise from −115 dBm, so a longer bar is a stronger signal. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Photo · Concourse B at gate B21Wikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of Concourse B in December 2023, with passengers queuing to board at gate B21 beside the gate podium and hold-room seating

Concourse B, boarding queue at gate B21, December 2023. Photo: DiscoA340, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Photo · Concourse C at gate C33Wikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of Concourse C at gate C33 in December 2023, showing the gate area, seating and concourse signage

Concourse C at gate C33, December 2023. Photo: DiscoA340, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

4.6 Concourses D, E and F

Concourse D hosts Delta Air Lines held. The widening program's new gates were turned over to Delta, and a Delta Sky Club sits at the D centerpoint.

Concourse DAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Over the building: healthy · median87% · −88.0 dBmn=11960% · −93.0 dBmn=15077% · −90.5 dBmn=142
Building verdictAT&T leads; share margin 11 points, median margin 2.5 dB
Healthy gate points34 of 41 (83%)1 of 41 (2%)0 of 41 (0%)
Gate-area median 5G−92.4 dBm−97.5 dBm−98.6 dBm
Strongest 5G at a gate (count)AT&T 41
Zone tiles healthyspread 30 points55%29%25%
Concourse D was under construction all window

The $1.4 billion widening program, 2024 to 2029, replaces the concourse module by module and widens it from 60 to 90 feet held. Five added gates opened on September 17, 2025 and three more on June 4, 2026, both inside this window.

Sections of the old concourse were closed throughout. Which gates were out of service on which dates is not held, so the Concourse D figures blend construction phases.

Fig. 17 · Per-gate 5G RSRP · 41 Concourse D gate pointsSource · Ookla
Per-gate mean 5G RSRP bars for the 41 Concourse D gate points across three carriers with the healthy line; AT&T has the strongest reading at every gate and clears the line at most of them, while T-Mobile and Verizon sit below the line at nearly every gate

FIG. 17. Per-gate 5G RSRP across the 41 Concourse D gate points (OpenStreetMap inventory). Each bar is a mean over the tiles within 80 m of the gate. Bars rise from −115 dBm, so a longer bar is a stronger signal. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Photo · Concourse D gate D11 hold room, August 2024Wikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of the Concourse D gate D11 hold room in August 2024 during the widening program, with rows of seating, the gate podium and windows onto the apron

Concourse D gate D11 hold room, August 2024, during the widening program. Photo: Vmzp85, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The Maynard H. Jackson Jr. International Terminal opened in 2012. Concourse F is attached to it, and Concourse E is reached through the E-F connector. The airport fact sheet publishes 43 international gates held.

Concourse E hosts Delta and international carriers held. It has a Delta Sky Club across from gate E15 and an American Express Centurion Lounge next to gate E11. Per-airline assignments are not held.

Concourse EAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Over the building: healthy · median69% · −92.0 dBmn=33950% · −95.0 dBmn=46453% · −95.0 dBmn=379
Building verdictAT&T leads; share margin 17 points, median margin 3.0 dB
Healthy gate points18 of 32 (56%)0 of 32 (0%)1 of 32 (3%)
Gate-area median 5G−95.0 dBm−97.5 dBm−97.5 dBm
Strongest 5G at a gate (count)AT&T 20 · tie within 1 dB 12
Zone tiles healthyspread 23 points52%29%29%

Concourse F hosts Delta long-haul and foreign-flag carriers held. The official 2012 map shows gates F1 to F14. A Delta Sky Club and The Club at ATL sit on the mezzanine level. The table adds the International Terminal building itself.

Concourse FAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Over the building: healthy · median55% · −94.0 dBmn=15738% · −97.0 dBmn=21736% · −99.0 dBmn=166
Building verdictAT&T leads; share margin 17 points, median margin 3.0 dB
International Terminal building: healthy · median49% · −96.0 dBmn=4927% · −97.0 dBmn=6061% · −93.0 dBmn=59
International Terminal verdictVerizon leads; share margin 12 points, median margin 3.0 dB
Healthy gate points (count)2 of 120 of 120 of 12
Gate-area median 5G−97.1 dBm−97.6 dBm−98.5 dBm
Strongest 5G at a gate (count)Tie within 1 dB 6 · AT&T 4 · T-Mobile 2
Zone tiles healthyspread 21 points36%42%57%
Fig. 18 · Per-gate 5G RSRP · 44 Concourse E and F gate pointsSource · Ookla
Per-gate mean 5G RSRP bars for the 44 Concourse E and F gate points across three carriers with the healthy line; AT&T clears the line through the middle of Concourse E and drops below it across most of Concourse F, while T-Mobile and Verizon sit below the line at nearly every gate

FIG. 18. Per-gate 5G RSRP across the 44 Concourse E and F gate points (OpenStreetMap inventory). Each bar is a mean over the tiles within 80 m of the gate. Bars rise from −115 dBm, so a longer bar is a stronger signal. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Photo · Concourse E, gates E1 to E12Wikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of Concourse E in December 2023, with overhead wayfinding signage pointing to gates E1 to E12

Concourse E, gates E1 to E12 signage, December 2023. Photo: DiscoA340, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Photo · Concourse F central atriumWikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of the Concourse F central atrium in May 2023, a tall multi-level hall with a skylight, escalators and concession frontages around the floor

Concourse F central atrium, May 2023. The International Terminal building is the lowest building reading for T-Mobile and AT&T, and Concourse F is the lowest for Verizon (section 4.7). Photo: Harrison Keely, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

4.7 Building-masked view (OSM polygons)

This is the only basis on which the report names a leader. Over the nine passenger buildings, the three carriers are far closer than at the gate areas.

Three buildings are ties: the Domestic Terminal, Concourse T and Concourse B. AT&T leads over Concourses C, D, E and F. T-Mobile leads over Concourse A, and Verizon over the International Terminal.

Leader rule, stated once

A carrier leads a building only when it is alone at the top on both measures: the healthy share by more than 1 point and the median by more than 1 dB. Otherwise every carrier within those margins of the top on either measure is tied.

The rule runs on unrounded values, so a printed 70% can sit more than 1 point from a printed 71%. The margins shown are the unrounded ones. Every ranked cell clears the 30-tile floor.

Fig. 19 · 5G NR class for tiles over the nine OSM building footprintsSource · Ookla · OSM
Three stacked tile maps showing only the tiles whose centroids fall inside the nine OpenStreetMap passenger-building footprints, colored by 5G RSRP coverage class for T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T, with the per-building per-carrier table beneath; the domestic piers read mostly green for all three carriers, and Concourse F and the International Terminal at the east end carry the most amber

FIG. 19. Tiles whose centroid falls inside a pinned OSM passenger-building polygon, colored by 5G NR class, with the per-building per-carrier table. The polygons are the seven concourses, the Domestic Terminal, and the International Terminal. This is our OSM building-polygon mask, not Ookla's Indoor layer. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Building (OSM polygon)AT&T · n · healthy · medianT-Mobile · n · healthy · medianVerizon · n · healthy · medianLeader (tie-aware)
Domestic Terminal354 · 54% · −95.0 dBm440 · 56% · −95.0 dBm378 · 55% · −94.0 dBmThree-way tieshare margin 0 points · median 1.0 dB
Concourse T203 · 70% · −92.0 dBm256 · 70% · −93.0 dBm217 · 71% · −91.0 dBmTwo-way tie (AT&T, Verizon)share margin 1 point · median 1.0 dB
Concourse A177 · 81% · −91.0 dBm222 · 87% · −89.0 dBm211 · 71% · −91.0 dBmT-Mobile leadsshare margin 6 points · median 2.0 dB
Concourse B181 · 72% · −91.0 dBm228 · 74% · −92.0 dBm208 · 71% · −91.5 dBmThree-way tieshare margin 2 points · median 0.5 dB
Concourse C166 · 89% · −87.0 dBm211 · 80% · −92.0 dBm196 · 65% · −91.5 dBmAT&T leadsshare margin 8 points · median 4.5 dB
Concourse D119 · 87% · −88.0 dBm150 · 60% · −93.0 dBm142 · 77% · −90.5 dBmAT&T leadsshare margin 11 points · median 2.5 dB
Concourse E339 · 69% · −92.0 dBm464 · 50% · −95.0 dBm379 · 53% · −95.0 dBmAT&T leadsshare margin 17 points · median 3.0 dB
Concourse F157 · 55% · −94.0 dBm217 · 38% · −97.0 dBm166 · 36% · −99.0 dBmAT&T leadsshare margin 17 points · median 3.0 dB
International Terminal49 · 49% · −96.0 dBm60 · 27% · −97.0 dBm59 · 61% · −93.0 dBmVerizon leadsshare margin 12 points · median 3.0 dB

5G over the building footprints. Healthy = tile 5G RSRP ≥ −95 dBm; median over the tiles whose centre falls within the polygon. n counts tiles, not scans.

CarrierLowest buildingHealthyHighest buildingHealthy
AT&TInternational Terminal49%Concourse C89%
T-MobileInternational Terminal27%Concourse A87%
VerizonConcourse F36%Concourse D77%

LTE is the fall-back layer when 5G is weak. Over the same footprints it reads as follows.

Building (OSM polygon)AT&T · n · LTE healthy · medianT-Mobile · n · LTE healthy · medianVerizon · n · LTE healthy · median
Domestic Terminal438 · 77% · −92.0 dBm436 · 49% · −96.0 dBm431 · 69% · −93.0 dBm
Concourse T259 · 78% · −91.0 dBm258 · 66% · −93.0 dBm250 · 60% · −93.0 dBm
Concourse A212 · 88% · −89.0 dBm215 · 72% · −91.0 dBm220 · 83% · −90.5 dBm
Concourse B226 · 85% · −91.0 dBm226 · 71% · −93.0 dBm229 · 71% · −92.0 dBm
Concourse C207 · 84% · −89.0 dBm210 · 72% · −91.5 dBm211 · 81% · −92.0 dBm
Concourse D150 · 86% · −90.0 dBm150 · 69% · −92.0 dBm152 · 80% · −90.0 dBm
Concourse E450 · 76% · −91.0 dBm453 · 71% · −92.0 dBm447 · 73% · −91.0 dBm
Concourse F218 · 80% · −91.0 dBm214 · 49% · −96.0 dBm206 · 32% · −98.0 dBm
International Terminal61 · 85% · −90.0 dBm58 · 33% · −98.0 dBm59 · 51% · −95.0 dBm

LTE over the building footprints, the graceful-degradation floor on the leader basis. n counts tiles.

Why the gate areas cannot name a leader. The area within 80 m of each gate reaches the apron on both sides of each pier. Across the 201 gate points, a median of 22.4% of those tiles sit over a building. The highest at any gate is 68%. So a gate-area figure is mostly an outdoor apron reading.

ConcourseMedian share of gate-area tiles over a building
Concourse T21.8%
Concourse A22.8%
Concourse B23.2%
Concourse C23.9%
Concourse D15.2%
Concourse E22.6%
Concourse F34.2%

At the gate areas, T-Mobile and Verizon sit below the line at nearly every gate. Over the buildings, the three are tied at three buildings and T-Mobile leads over Concourse A.

What the building mask can and cannot show

The mask tests each tile's centre against the pinned OpenStreetMap footprints. It selects tiles over a building, not tiles measured inside it (section 16). Ookla's own Indoor layer is not used here (section 15).

The gap between the building and apron readings fits an in-building system that serves the pier interiors and hands off to the macro layer at the building edge. It fits equally well with a pier's own structure weakening a mid-band macro signal. The export cannot separate the two. Recommendation 1 asks for the record that would.

4.8 What the readings mean along the passenger journey (interpretation)

Read this as a walk, not a leader board. Every number is a crowdsourced tile aggregate, and the basis changes by stage.

Photo · MARTA Airport Station fare gatesWikimedia Commons
Photograph of the MARTA Airport Station fare gates at the west end of the Domestic Terminal in June 2024, with a row of fare gates and the station concourse beyond

MARTA Airport Station fare gates at the west end of the Domestic Terminal, June 2024. This is the first place an arriving rail passenger's handset meets the airport network. Photo: ElToAn123, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Photo · Domestic Terminal baggage claimWikimedia Commons
Photograph of the Domestic Terminal baggage claim hall in August 2024, with baggage carousel 8 and its overhead flight display

Domestic Terminal baggage claim, carousel 8, August 2024. Photo: Vmzp85, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Fig. 20 · Healthy 5G share per carrier at each stage of the passenger journeySource · Ookla · OSM
Grouped bar chart of the healthy 5G share per carrier at seven stages of a passenger's path; the three carriers are close together in the Domestic Terminal building and the Concourse T building, AT&T pulls ahead at the concourse centres and the gate areas where T-Mobile and Verizon fall well below half, and in the International Terminal building Verizon has the tallest bar

FIG. 20. Healthy 5G share per carrier at each stage of a passenger's path. The stages are the Domestic Terminal building, Concourse T, the concourse centres at the Plane Train, the gate areas, and the International Terminal. The basis changes by stage (building mask, 80 m pools around the concourse centres, per-gate means) and is named in the table. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31; OpenStreetMap footprints.

Journey stage (basis)AT&T: healthy · medianT-Mobile: healthy · medianVerizon: healthy · median
Domestic Terminal buildingcheck-in, security, baggage claim; tiles over the footprint54% · −95.0 dBmn=35456% · −95.0 dBmn=44055% · −94.0 dBmn=378
Concourse T buildingthe first pier, reached on foot70% · −92.0 dBmn=20370% · −93.0 dBmn=25671% · −91.0 dBmn=217
Concourse centres A to DPlane Train station; tiles within 80 m of the centre69% · −91.0 dBmn=39253% · −95.0 dBmn=73042% · −97.0 dBmn=672
Gate areas A to Dper-gate means within 80 m; mostly apron74% · −92.7 dBmn=13621% · −96.2 dBmn=1367% · −97.5 dBmn=136
Concourse centres E and FPlane Train station55% · −94.0 dBmn=18233% · −97.0 dBmn=37037% · −98.0 dBmn=226
Gate areas E and Fper-gate means within 80 m45% · −95.3 dBmn=440% · −97.5 dBmn=442% · −98.0 dBmn=44
International Terminal buildinginternational check-in and arrivals; tiles over the footprint49% · −96.0 dBmn=4927% · −97.0 dBmn=6061% · −93.0 dBmn=59

n counts tiles for building and centre rows and gate points for gate-area rows.

Check-in, security and baggage claim are even. In the Domestic Terminal building the three carriers are within 2 points of each other. Every median sits at or near the healthy line, so the experience is middling but similar whatever the handset.

Over the domestic pier footprints, every carrier is above half. The Plane Train delivers passengers to a concourse centre (the journey table in this section). Over the Concourse A to D buildings, the lowest share for any carrier is 60%.

CarrierHealthy over Concourses A to D (buildings)Lowest pier building
AT&T72 to 89%Concourse B (72%)
T-Mobile60 to 87%Concourse D (60%)
Verizon65 to 77%Concourse C (65%)

The apron-weighted gate areas are where the carriers separate. Apron-weighted means most of the 80 m pool around each gate is apron, not building. At the A to D gate areas, AT&T is healthy at 74% of gate points, T-Mobile at 21% and Verizon at 7%. So on the apron side of these gates, T-Mobile and Verizon read below the line on 5G more often than not, and AT&T does not. The data does not reach the jet bridge itself.

The international side holds each carrier's lowest building. AT&T and T-Mobile read lowest over the International Terminal (49% and 27%), and Verizon over Concourse F (36%). Verizon is also the one carrier above half over the International Terminal building (61%). At the E and F gate areas, T-Mobile and Verizon are healthy at almost no gate points.

LTE holds over the pier footprints and thins on the apron. Over the building footprints, LTE is healthy on 76 to 88% of tiles for AT&T, 33 to 72% for T-Mobile and 32 to 83% for Verizon. At the gate points, the LTE medians are AT&T −92.4, T-Mobile −95.8 and Verizon −96.4 dBm. Section 9.2 gives service availability.

Section 5

Tenant level

284 points · tile basis behind each category

Tenant readings use 284 mapped points. They come from a Google Places and OpenStreetMap capture pinned 2026-09-21.

Most categories hold 30 points or fewer, so comparisons do not run on points. They run on the tiles within 80 m of each category's points, deduplicated. Point counts appear on every axis.

How to read this section

Every tenant pool includes apron and roadway tiles. Tile RSRP is a whole number of dB, so medians and differences move in 1 dB steps. A margin of 1 dB or less is a tie, not a ranking.

5.1 Category signal strength and quality

Seven categories clear the 30-tile floor for every carrier: transport_admin, retail, food, lounge, services, admin and other. The spread between carriers differs by category.

CategoryCarrier-to-carrier spread (tile median)
transport_admin1 dB
retail4 dB
food5 dB
lounge5 dB
services4 dB
admin3 dB
other12 dB

This report does not publish a category ordering. Read the charts as a pattern.

Fig. 21 · Median 5G RSRP by tenant categorySource · Ookla
Bar chart of median 5G RSRP per carrier for each tenant category on the tile basis, with point counts and minimum tiles per carrier on the axis; bars rise from −115 dBm so a longer bar is a stronger signal

FIG. 21. Median 5G RSRP by tenant category (tile basis; points and minimum tiles per carrier on the axis). Bars rise from −115 dBm, so a longer bar is a stronger signal. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Fig. 22 · Median 5G SINR by tenant categorySource · Ookla
Bar chart of median 5G signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio per carrier for each tenant category on the tile basis

FIG. 22. Median 5G SINR by tenant category (tile basis). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

5.2 Terminal vs periphery RSRP proxy

This proxy compares tenants over the building footprints with tenants outside them. Terminal categories are the concessions, lounges and services in the concourse and terminal footprints. Periphery categories are the parking decks and lots, the hotel and the fire stations.

−1.0 dB
AT&T · periphery −95.0 dBm (n=1,311 tiles behind 61 points) · terminal −94.0 dBm (n=3,554 tiles behind 223 points)
+1.0 dB
T-Mobile · periphery −96.0 dBm (n=2,774 tiles behind 61 points) · terminal −97.0 dBm (n=7,189 tiles behind 223 points)
+2.0 dB
Verizon · periphery −96.0 dBm (n=1,601 tiles behind 61 points) · terminal −98.0 dBm (n=5,944 tiles behind 223 points)

Periphery minus terminal median 5G RSRP, tile basis.

A large positive delta is consistent with macro signal spilling in from outside. A negative delta, where the terminal reads stronger, is consistent with an in-building source serving the concourses.

Two of the three deltas sit within the 1 dB noise floor. AT&T at −1.0 dB and T-Mobile at +1.0 dB are ties, so neither is evidence of an in-building source. Only Verizon's +2.0 dB clears the floor, and it is consistent with macro spill from outside.

Distance to macro sites confounds all three readings. Section 9.3 places the estimated macro sites.

Fig. 23 · Median 5G RSRP · terminal vs periphery tenant categoriesSource · Ookla
Per-carrier median 5G RSRP over terminal-category tiles beside periphery-category tiles, with n and the healthy line; the AT&T terminal bar reads 1 dB stronger than its periphery bar, while T-Mobile and Verizon read stronger over the periphery

FIG. 23. Per-carrier median 5G RSRP, terminal tenant categories vs periphery categories, on the tile basis. Proxy: category-based masking, not Ookla's building-polygon indoor mask (queued, section 15). Bars rise from −115 dBm, so a longer bar is a stronger signal. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

5.3 Airline gate clusters

An airline sees its exposure through its concourse and its passengers' carriers. The airline column is the set the airport's published concourse guide places in each concourse.

Concourse groupings, not airline measurements

A per-airline gate assignment is not held. Each row is a concourse, and its tile pool includes apron and roadway.

Concourse: airlines heldGate points (n)AT&T median 5G RSRPT-Mobile median 5G RSRPVerizon median 5G RSRP
Concourse T (Domestic Terminal complex): American, United and Delta, with other domestic carriers21−95.0 dBmn=2518−97.0 dBmn=4995−99.0 dBmn=3403
Concourse A (Domestic Terminal complex): Delta Air Lines29−96.0 dBmn=612−98.0 dBmn=1696−100.0 dBmn=1535
Concourse B (Domestic Terminal complex): Delta Air Lines32−96.0 dBmn=539−100.0 dBmn=1829−100.0 dBmn=1554
Concourse C (Domestic Terminal complex): Delta Connection and Southwest Airlines34−93.0 dBmn=387−99.0 dBmn=1514−100.0 dBmn=1259
Concourse D (Domestic Terminal complex): Delta Air Lines41−94.0 dBmn=440−99.0 dBmn=1548−102.0 dBmn=1361
Concourse E (International Terminal complex): Delta and international carriers32−95.0 dBmn=845−99.0 dBmn=2595−100.0 dBmn=2068
Concourse F (International Terminal complex): Delta long-haul and foreign-flag carriers12−99.0 dBmn=1107−97.0 dBmn=3283−93.0 dBmn=1895

Tile basis; n = tiles per carrier per concourse. Airline sets transcribed from the airport's published concourse guide.

5.4 Retail and food brand coverage

Brands with several locations are a consistency check across zones, not a comparison. Each has 6 points at most, so no carrier ordering is read from this table.

30 of the 45 cells sit below the healthy line. Every cell carries its coverage class, so a sub-healthy value cannot pass unmarked. Each point value is a mean over the tiles within 80 m of the point. Each cell is the median of those point values across the brand's points, and n sums the tiles behind them.

Brand (2 or more points)Points (n)AT&T median 5G RSRP (dBm)T-Mobile median 5G RSRP (dBm)Verizon median 5G RSRP (dBm)
Starbucks6−91.9healthy, n=917−95.5at-risk, n=1020−96.5at-risk, n=952
Chick-fil-A2−91.7healthy, n=316−93.0healthy, n=357−95.8at-risk, n=348
Popeyes3−93.7healthy, n=544−96.9at-risk, n=570−97.8at-risk, n=569
Dunkin3−94.3healthy, n=529−95.7at-risk, n=563−97.7at-risk, n=542
TGI Friday3−93.1healthy, n=525−96.4at-risk, n=551−96.5at-risk, n=528
Auntie Anne3−91.9healthy, n=499−96.2at-risk, n=531−97.4at-risk, n=548
Five Guys2−91.1healthy, n=309−94.7healthy, n=358−95.7at-risk, n=342
McDonald2−93.8healthy, n=366−95.7at-risk, n=388−96.2at-risk, n=366
Burger King2−95.2at-risk, n=371−96.5at-risk, n=382−95.7at-risk, n=363
Caribou Coffee2−96.0at-risk, n=336−97.7at-risk, n=355−99.7at-risk, n=346
Qdoba2−92.5healthy, n=385−95.2at-risk, n=391−94.3healthy, n=368
Asian Chao2−94.1healthy, n=327−96.8at-risk, n=359−97.7at-risk, n=358
Hudson4−95.5at-risk, n=402−96.9at-risk, n=479−97.9at-risk, n=406
InMotion5−93.8healthy, n=883−95.6at-risk, n=941−97.0at-risk, n=899
Tumi2−93.7healthy, n=366−97.5at-risk, n=384−96.5at-risk, n=352

Count-only view (fewer than 30 points per brand); never ranked. n = tiles. Per-point tile n in Appendix A of the report.

5.5 Airline and premium lounges present in the pinned capture

The capture holds 16 lounge points. A hygiene pass refiled the airline and card-issuer lounges that the capture had listed as food or restaurant.

Each lounge is a single point, reported for scope and not ranked. Names are printed as the capture spells them.

CarrierLounge points healthy (count)Median 5G RSRP across points
AT&T12 of 16−92.8 dBm
T-Mobile3 of 16−96.8 dBm
Verizon1 of 16−97.5 dBm

Counts of single lounge points, not a ranking.

Lounge pointZoneAT&T 5G RSRPT-Mobile 5G RSRPVerizon 5G RSRP
Admirals ClubConcourse T−94.6 dBmhealthy, n=185−95.2 dBmat-risk, n=186−97.3 dBmat-risk, n=171
Delta Sky Club (Concourse T)Concourse T−95.4 dBmat-risk, n=186−97.6 dBmat-risk, n=191−100.0 dBmat-risk, n=182
USO Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International AirportConcourse T−92.8 dBmhealthy, n=189−93.8 dBmhealthy, n=192−90.8 dBmhealthy, n=188
United ClubConcourse T−95.5 dBmat-risk, n=174−94.9 dBmhealthy, n=179−97.1 dBmat-risk, n=157
Delta Sky Club (Concourse A near Gate A17)Concourse A−92.7 dBmhealthy, n=190−94.3 dBmhealthy, n=193−96.3 dBmat-risk, n=193
Minute Suites - ATL B24Concourse B−92.3 dBmhealthy, n=178−96.6 dBmat-risk, n=187−98.0 dBmat-risk, n=185
Delta Sky Club (Concourse C)Concourse C−91.9 dBmhealthy, n=173−95.3 dBmat-risk, n=193−97.4 dBmat-risk, n=185
Delta Sky Club (Concourse D)Concourse D−90.4 dBmhealthy, n=174−95.5 dBmat-risk, n=175−95.8 dBmat-risk, n=174
Delta Skyclub LoungeConcourse D−91.9 dBmhealthy, n=140−97.0 dBmat-risk, n=165−97.7 dBmat-risk, n=168
American Express Centurion LoungeConcourse E−91.8 dBmhealthy, n=182−97.4 dBmat-risk, n=191−97.5 dBmat-risk, n=182
Delta Sky Club (Concourse E)Concourse E−93.6 dBmhealthy, n=169−98.1 dBmat-risk, n=193−99.7 dBmat-risk, n=184
Delta Skyclub LoungeConcourse E−92.1 dBmhealthy, n=161−97.6 dBmat-risk, n=191−99.1 dBmat-risk, n=174
Minute Suites ATL – Concourse E, AtriumConcourse E−92.1 dBmhealthy, n=182−96.6 dBmat-risk, n=188−96.4 dBmat-risk, n=174
Delta Sky Club (Concourse F)Concourse F−95.7 dBmat-risk, n=186−98.0 dBmat-risk, n=187−98.1 dBmat-risk, n=182
Minute Suites ATL - Concourse FConcourse F−96.7 dBmat-risk, n=150−97.0 dBmat-risk, n=186−98.9 dBmat-risk, n=135
The Club at ATLConcourse F−94.7 dBmhealthy, n=192−97.0 dBmat-risk, n=193−96.1 dBmat-risk, n=189

Single-point aggregates over the tiles within 80 m of each point; n = tiles. Reported for scope, not ranked.

A lounge is where a passenger sits for an hour with a laptop. Section 5.6 reads these results together with the Wi-Fi figures.

5.6 What the readings mean for tenants (interpretation)

A concessionaire's question is not which carrier wins. It is whether a customer at the counter, and the payment terminal behind it, has usable signal on whatever network they use.

Concessions sit at the concourse centres and along the pier interiors. The table reads the tiles within 80 m of the food and retail points in each concourse.

Fig. 24 · Healthy 5G share over the concession areas per concourse and carrierSource · Ookla · OSM
Grouped bar chart of the share of tiles with healthy 5G within 80 m of the food and retail points in each of the seven concourses, per carrier, with the point count per concourse on the axis; AT&T is the tallest bar in every concourse, peaking at 69% in Concourse C and dropping to 48% in Concourse F, while T-Mobile and Verizon sit between 31% and 49%

FIG. 24. Share of tiles with healthy 5G within 80 m of the food and retail points in each concourse, per carrier. The axis shows the point count per concourse. The pools sit over the concourse centres and the pier interiors, where the concessions are. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31; OpenStreetMap venue points.

Concourse (concessions)AT&T: healthy · median 5GT-Mobile: healthy · median 5GVerizon: healthy · median 5GDevice density around the concessions (12 months)
Concourse T28 food+retail points57% · −94.0 dBmn=1,03649% · −96.0 dBmn=1,53241% · −98.0 dBmn=1,220median 20 per tile over 1,664 usage tiles53,777 device-tile observations
Concourse A20 food+retail points56% · −95.0 dBmn=47845% · −97.0 dBmn=1,02937% · −98.0 dBmn=946median 12 per tile over 1,242 usage tiles32,595 device-tile observations
Concourse B23 food+retail points57% · −94.0 dBmn=40538% · −98.0 dBmn=1,03537% · −99.0 dBmn=927median 11 per tile over 1,237 usage tiles31,440 device-tile observations
Concourse C17 food+retail points69% · −91.0 dBmn=27948% · −96.0 dBmn=80036% · −99.0 dBmn=678median 8 per tile over 997 usage tiles23,395 device-tile observations
Concourse D24 food+retail points62% · −92.0 dBmn=28433% · −98.0 dBmn=82031% · −101.0 dBmn=757median 11 per tile over 1,011 usage tiles24,238 device-tile observations
Concourse E15 food+retail points68% · −92.0 dBmn=27141% · −97.0 dBmn=46241% · −97.5 dBmn=334median 17 per tile over 497 usage tiles15,062 device-tile observations
Concourse F26 food+retail points48% · −96.0 dBmn=37233% · −98.0 dBmn=71442% · −97.0 dBmn=467median 10 per tile over 812 usage tiles25,205 device-tile observations

Tile basis behind the food and retail points; n = tiles per carrier. Density is the per-tile median of User_Density (unique devices per tile over the window). The device-tile sum counts a device once per tile it crosses, so it is not used to rank.

Concourse T carries the densest concession floor, at a median of 20 devices per tile. Concourse D is where the weakest carrier's share over the concessions is lowest, at 31%.

Three practical readings follow. Each is an inference from crowdsourced tiles, not a site survey, and each uses the building basis of section 4.7.

  1. On the international side, plan for Wi-Fi and LTE fallback

    Over the Concourse F footprint, T-Mobile and Verizon 5G is below the healthy line more often than not (38% and 36% of tiles healthy). Payment terminals, order-ahead pickups and loyalty apps on those networks will lean on Wi-Fi or on LTE.

    LTE over the same footprint is healthy on AT&T 80%, T-Mobile 49% and Verizon 32% of tiles. Over the International Terminal building, Verizon is the one carrier above half (61%) and T-Mobile the lowest (27%). There, the same caution applies to T-Mobile and AT&T customers.

    Over the domestic piers, every carrier is above half on the building basis. The offload share in each zone (section 7) shows how much traffic already rides Wi-Fi.

  2. Walk-test the lounges first

    The lounges (section 5.5) are where passengers typically sit and work for a while. A lounge customer notices a bad hour in a way a passenger buying a coffee does not.

  3. The Wi-Fi layer already exists at the concessions

    Section 7.2 shows Wi-Fi observed at every mapped point in every category. What is not held is which of it is the public network and which is tenant-owned. Controller telemetry (section 15) would answer that.

Section 6

Load and density

Device density · zone level
Photo · Domestic Terminal South departures curb, October 2025Wikimedia Commons
Photograph of the Domestic Terminal South upper-level departures curb in October 2025, with the terminal frontage, canopy and drop-off lanes

Domestic Terminal South upper-level departures curb, October 2025, inside the window. Photo: Mccunicano, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Illustrative, resized only.

Device density is this dataset's demand signal. This section reports where devices are seen and where they meet weak signal. It does not rank zones or set re-measurement order, which Recommendation 3 sets on the building basis.

What User_Density counts

Ookla's User_Density field counts the unique Android devices seen on a tile over the window, deduplicated within the tile. It does not count simultaneous users, and it does not measure time spent. A sum over many tiles counts a device once per tile it crosses, so it is reported as device-tile observations, never as unique devices.

Density by concourse zone

Per-tile medians are low everywhere. The 95th percentile shows where crowds build. The on-airport median is 2 devices per tile across 44,155 usage tiles.

ZoneMedian devices per tile95th percentileUsage tiles (n)
Concourse T4606,664
Concourse A4682,686
Concourse B4672,816
Concourse C3622,492
Concourse D3522,511
Concourse E3484,184
Concourse F2355,277
Demand where no carrier is healthy

This measure puts weak signal and demand in one number. For each zone, it adds up User_Density over the tiles where every carrier reporting 5G is below −95.0 dBm.

Only tiles where all three carriers report are counted, and that total is shown as the denominator. The usage and radio exports share one tile grid and are joined tile to tile. A coarser join would take the worst reading within about 110 m and saturate.

ZoneDevice-tile observations where every carrier is below healthyOf all counted (denominator)ShareWeakest carrier in the zone tile pool (section 4.1)
Concourse T10,78373,15315%Verizon
Concourse F5,91828,09721%AT&T
Concourse E5,49027,71420%T-Mobile and Verizon tied
Concourse A5,22028,00619%Verizon
Concourse B3,17526,70312%T-Mobile and Verizon tied
Concourse D2,51520,47112%Verizon
Concourse C1,06319,6195%Verizon

Device-tile observations: a device counts once per tile it crosses, so the sum scales with the zone's tile count. It is not a count of unique devices and not a passenger count. The weakest-carrier column uses the zone basis. It names the carrier with the largest below-healthy share of the zone's tiles, and a margin within 1 point is a tie.

The zone basis and the building basis can disagree. In the Concourse F zone, AT&T has the lowest healthy share (36% of 1,107 tiles). Yet it leads over the Concourse F building by 17 points (section 4.7). The zone pool is mostly apron, taxiway and roadway, so it is not a building verdict.

Concourse T has the largest sum because its zone also holds the Domestic Terminal landside. That includes the hourly and daily decks, the economy lots and the MARTA station, so it carries the most usage tiles.

Fig. 25 · Device density by concourse zone · device-tile observations where no carrier is healthySource · Ookla
Left: median and 95th-percentile devices per tile by concourse zone, with every median between 2 and 4 and the 95th percentile lowest in Concourse F. Right: horizontal bars of device-tile observations on tiles where every carrier is below the healthy line, per zone with the denominator printed; Concourse T is the longest bar at 10,783 of 73,153 and Concourse C the shortest at 1,063 of 19,619

FIG. 25. Left: unique-device density by concourse zone (median and 95th percentile per tile; User_Density = unique devices per tile over the window, deduplicated within the tile). Right: device-tile observations on tiles where every carrier is below the healthy line. The count covers only tiles where all three carriers report 5G, and the chart shows that denominator. A sum over tiles counts a device once per tile it crosses. It scales with the zone's tile count and is not a count of unique devices. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics All Networks usage export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Observed data volume

Usage volume shows where bandwidth is consumed, by bearer and by zone. It is sample volume from the crowdsource panel, not total traffic.

Fig. 26 · Observed data volume by concourse zone and bearerSource · Ookla
Grouped bars of observed mobile and Wi-Fi data volume in gigabytes by concourse zone over the 12-month window

FIG. 26. Observed data volume by concourse zone and bearer (GB over the 12-month window). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics All Networks usage export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Section 7

Wi-Fi as an augmentation layer

Venue and zone level only

Wi-Fi is already present in every concourse. Wi-Fi usage is observed on 58.4% of the 34,322 on-airport usage tiles that report the Wi-Fi field.

This presence rate is a different figure from the offload share in section 7.1. A tile that does not report the field has no measurement. It is left out of the denominator and is not evidence of no Wi-Fi.

The augmentation opportunity is largest where the worst-served carrier is weakest and Wi-Fi presence is high. At this venue, that is every concourse.

Fig. 27 · Weakest-carrier weak share beside Wi-Fi presence, by concourse zoneSource · Ookla
Paired bars per concourse zone: the share of tiles where the weakest carrier is below the healthy line in red, beside the Wi-Fi presence rate in purple

FIG. 27. By concourse zone: the share of tiles where the WEAKEST carrier is below the healthy line, beside the Wi-Fi presence rate. Both bars point the same way, so a tall red bar with a tall purple bar is a zone where Wi-Fi is already carrying the gap. Zone n counts usage tiles that report the Wi-Fi field, so it is smaller than the density n in FIG. 25. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics All Networks usage export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

7.1 Offload share (venue and zone level only)

In the concourse zones, 41.7% of observed data volume moves over Wi-Fi.

ScopeWi-Fi share of observed data volumeUsage tiles (n)
Tiles assigned to a concourse zone41.7%26,630
Usage tiles outside every zone52.4%17,525
Whole clip (aerodrome plus 200 m buffer)42.5%44,155

Offload share = Σ Wi-Fi MB ÷ Σ all MB on the All Networks panel.

The 200 m buffer around the aerodrome takes in the parking decks, the rental-car and hotel approaches, the cargo aprons and roadway. Those are not concourse tiles, so the concourse-zone figure is the headline.

No per-carrier offload

Locked rule (section 16): offload is computed at venue and zone level only. The export does not attribute Wi-Fi usage to any carrier's subscribers, so per-carrier offload cannot be derived and is not implied. The figure blends the public network with tenant, airline lounge, hotel and personal networks.

Fig. 28 · Wi-Fi share of observed data volume by concourse zoneSource · Ookla
Bar chart of the Wi-Fi share of observed data volume per concourse zone with the venue reference line drawn across

FIG. 28. Wi-Fi share of observed data volume by concourse zone, with the venue reference line. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics All Networks usage export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

7.2 Tenant-level Wi-Fi footprint

Wi-Fi is observed at every mapped point in every tenant category. Presence does not tell categories apart here. Volume does, and FIG. 29 shows it.

CategoryWi-Fi presencePoints (n)
transport_admin100%35
retail100%47
food100%106
lounge100%16
services100%32
admin100%21
other100%13
Fig. 29 · Median observed Wi-Fi data volume per tile by tenant categorySource · Ookla
Bar chart of median observed Wi-Fi data volume per tile behind each tenant category

FIG. 29. Median observed Wi-Fi data volume per tile behind each tenant category. The companion presence-rate chart is not drawn because presence is at or near 100% in every category; the rates and point counts are in the text. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics All Networks usage export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

The public network: ATL Free Wi-Fi held

The airport operates ATL Free Wi-Fi on its own network. It launched free in June 2014, with several hundred access points installed by airport IT staff and contractors at a City-approved cost of $5,622,249.

No third-party Wi-Fi concessionaire was found in the public record. The current equipment generation is not held.

The Wi-Fi figures here come only from the Ookla usage layer. Controller telemetry (section 15) would turn presence into capacity.

Section 8

Private wireless and the in-building layer

DAS replacement · CBRS · open items

Hartsfield-Jackson owns its in-building cellular system, and it was being replaced inside this window. The window therefore blends the end-of-life legacy system and the new one.

The airport-owned DAS

A distributed antenna system (DAS) carries the carriers' signals indoors over one shared infrastructure. At ATL it is airport-owned and neutral-host, meaning any carrier can ride it.

FactRecord
Original systemFirst commissioned in 2010, with more than 700 antennas across the terminal, atrium, concourses and the underground transportation mall, plus a separate layer for public-safety radio held
Replacement approvedMay 19, 2025: the Atlanta City Council approved carrier agreements for a replacement DAS held
Carriers signedT-Mobile and AT&T held
Target completionJanuary 2026, inside this window held
What changesThe airport states the replacement moves the system from 4G to 5G on a neutral-host design that can carry any future carrier, and upgrades the radio distribution used by public-safety personnel held
What the Imagine knowledge graph adds

The reconciled Airport DAS Master (2026-07-28) in the Imagine knowledge graph describes the earlier system.

  1. ATL's DAS is self-owned and neutral host

    The record marks DAS, self-owned, and neutral host as yes, and the operator as unknown.

  2. The integrator of the 2018 system

    Johnson Controls integrated the 2018 system. Contract term 2018 to 2022 at year precision. A field note records a 50 million dollar project installed by Johnson Controls and SMS that was due to expire in 2022.

  3. Later records name the upgrade but no vendor or dollar figure

    A neutral-host DAS deployment row dated 2025 has no vendor recorded. The airport's FY2025 annual comprehensive financial report names a Distributed Antenna System Upgrade as a major capital project, with no dollar figure. The City's FY2026 adopted budget book carries no individual DAS, Wi-Fi or cellular line.

The graph names the integrator of the 2018 system, not of the 2025 replacement. It narrows none of the open items below.

Not held at this issue (asked for in Recommendation 1)

The replacement's integrator and equipment vendor, and the City Council file for the May 19, 2025 carrier agreements.

Verizon's participation in the replacement system. The 2025 release does not name Verizon. Verizon was on the 2010 system.

The actual per-building cutover dates against the January 2026 target, and which buildings were live on the replacement system during this window.

The International Terminal and Concourse F cellular architecture. The airport's technology leadership described it in November 2025 as different from the rest of the campus.

Everything measured in this report stands without these items. They decide what the after reading is measured against.

Private wireless

No public record of a Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS), private LTE or private 5G network at the airport was located. Public-safety radio rides a separate layer of the airport-owned DAS, and the 2025 replacement upgrades that layer not independently verified.

The Ookla drop also held a separate five-tile export labelled with a CBRS operator. Five tiles is below the 30-tile floor, so it is kept in the audit dossier as a count and not surfaced here.

The public Ookla layer does not characterize private networks. AT&T's FirstNet Band 14 (LTE700PS) appears on 2,085 AT&T LTE tiles (section 9.1).

The following table is illustrative, not a finding. It lists typical large-hub workloads and the parties a private program would involve. Nothing in the data supports or selects any row.

WorkloadWhy a private network fitsCoordination required
Baggage handling system instrumentationDeterministic latency, contained RF, isolation from passenger trafficDepartment of Aviation, baggage system vendors
Ramp and ground-service vehicle telematicsOutdoor airside coverage with controlled SIM provisioningAirside operations, Delta ramp operations
Push-to-talk and operational voiceGuaranteed-quality voice independent of public carriersAtlanta Police Department Airport Section, Atlanta Fire Rescue, ground handlers
Fixed cameras and IoT in non-public areasBandwidth without consuming public-carrier capacityFacilities maintenance
Construction-phase connectivity (Concourse D modernization)Coverage that survives phased construction sequencingProgram management, contractors
Section 9

Spectrum, service availability, and estimated site positions

Bands · availability · Site Finder
9.1 Band distribution

The band a tile attaches to most often shows which spectrum each carrier puts to work at the venue. Sub-1 GHz attachment implies coverage-grade bands. Mid-band attachment implies strong penetration or an in-building source.

Reading the band labels

Labels are Ookla's, printed verbatim: technology plus approximate frequency in MHz. NR2500 and NR2600 are both 2.5 GHz spectrum. LTE800 and NR850 are both 850 MHz cellular spectrum.

NR3700 is C-band, a block of mid-band 5G spectrum.

LTE700PS is FirstNet Band 14, the public-safety broadband band. LTE1800 is an Ookla label as exported, not a United States band allocation.

Band fields populate only where Ookla resolved a serving cell, so band n is smaller than RSRP n (section 16).

Fig. 30 · Strongest-serving band distribution per carrier, 5G NR and LTESource · Ookla
Bar panels of the strongest-serving 5G NR and LTE bands per carrier with n on each panel: AT&T 5G leads on NR3700, T-Mobile 5G on NR2500, Verizon 5G on NR3700; LTE leads on LTE1900 for AT&T and LTE2100 for T-Mobile and Verizon

FIG. 30. Strongest-serving band distribution per carrier, 5G NR and LTE (n on each panel). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

AT&T (n = 2,223 NR tiles, 24,687 LTE tiles)

NR bandTiles (n)ShareLTE bandTiles (n)Share
NR37001,05447.4%LTE19007,83331.7%
NR85058226.2%LTE21005,72823.2%
NR350055024.7%LTE23004,80919.5%
NR2100251.1%LTE7003,96516.1%
NR1900110.5%LTE700PS2,0858.4%
NR250010.0%LTE8002501.0%
all other LTE bands170.1%

T-Mobile (n = 26,021 NR tiles, 21,271 LTE tiles)

NR bandTiles (n)ShareLTE bandTiles (n)Share
NR250014,41155.4%LTE210012,03956.6%
NR19005,35620.6%LTE19007,31634.4%
NR26003,87514.9%LTE7001,1115.2%
NR6002,3769.1%LTE18007653.6%
NR370030.0%LTE600400.2%

Verizon (n = 9,964 NR tiles, 23,342 LTE tiles)

NR bandTiles (n)ShareLTE bandTiles (n)Share
NR37006,28263.0%LTE210018,16277.8%
NR19001,99020.0%LTE7002,77011.9%
NR8501,09511.0%LTE8001,9598.4%
NR35005885.9%LTE19004501.9%
NR210080.1%LTE550010.0%
NR250010.0%

Share = band tiles ÷ the carrier's band-reporting tile footprint (report Appendix B).

9.2 Service availability

A device keeps a usable LTE layer almost everywhere on the campus. That holds even where the LTE level itself is below the healthy line at the piers (section 4.8).

CarrierMean own-network availabilityTiles (n)Mean general-LTE availabilityTiles (n)Share of on-airport tiles reporting
AT&T97%19,841100%19,86177%
T-Mobile98%25,52199%25,56177%
Verizon98%22,919100%22,94785%

Availability fields are not populated on every tile. The field-population table in section 16 lists every field on the same basis.

9.3 Estimated site positions (Ookla Site Finder)

Site Finder is Ookla's estimate of where each serving node sits, computed from the same crowdsourced tiles. It is a layer of estimated positions, not a registry.

How this report reads the layer, and no further

A centroid inside a 60 m wide concourse pier is consistent with a node in that pier, not with a macro site outside it. But a centroid is the position of the devices that reported a cell. An in-building remote in the pier produces the same result as a macro sector whose reporting devices were all inside the pier. The layer cannot tell them apart.

That in-building infrastructure exists rests on the held DAS record (section 8), not on this layer. That record names T-Mobile and AT&T as signed to the replacement system. Verizon's participation in this window is not held. The layer is read as consistent with that record and no further.

Fig. 31 · Ookla Site Finder LTE and 5G centroids over the terminal and concourse areaSource · Ookla
Maps of the terminal and concourse area with the passenger-building footprints outlined, plotting Ookla Site Finder estimated LTE centroids as circles and 5G centroids as triangles, colored by carrier; markers for all three carriers fall both inside the pier outlines and over the apron

FIG. 31. Ookla Site Finder LTE (circles) and 5G (triangles) centroids over the terminal and concourse area, per carrier, with the passenger-building footprints. Centroids are Ookla's ESTIMATED site positions derived from crowdsourced RF, not carrier registry data. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics Site Finder LTE and 5G centroid workbooks (estimated site positions), pulled with the 2026-09-21 drop.

All three carriers show estimated nodes of both technologies inside the building footprints.

TechCarrierCentroids (all)On-airportWithin a passenger-building footprintPer buildingMedian distance to the nearest building (on-airport)
LTEAT&T726140Domestic Terminal 6, T 4, A 6, B 5, C 6, D 6, E 4, F 2, International Terminal 120 m
LTET-Mobile332312Domestic Terminal 2, T 2, A 1, B 2, C 1, D 1, E 2, F 124 m
LTEVerizon766731Domestic Terminal 5, T 4, A 5, B 5, C 4, D 4, E 3, F 138 m
5GAT&T40339Domestic Terminal 2, A 1, B 2, C 1, D 1, E 1, F 142 m
5GT-Mobile755528Domestic Terminal 4, T 4, A 2, B 4, C 4, D 2, E 6, F 229 m
5GVerizon755929Domestic Terminal 4, T 4, A 3, B 5, C 3, D 3, E 6, F 124 m

Estimated positions, not a registry. 8 centroids labelled with 2 networks other than the three carriers of record are counted in the audit dossier and not surfaced.

Estimated node counts differ by carrier. The export cannot say whether that reflects sectorization, remotes per carrier or panel size. It is recorded as an observation for Recommendation 1.

The export also cannot say what any node carries, such as which bands and at what power. It cannot say whether each carrier's 5G rides on the node or on the macro layer. It cannot show how the hand-off at the jet bridge behaves. Those are the open items in section 8.

The concourse with the most estimated 5G nodes is not by itself the concourse with the highest healthy share (section 4.7). That is a second reason this layer is read as context, not as a ranking.

Section 10

Carrier-asymmetry atlas

Tie-aware weakest-carrier tally · 201 gate points

At 20 gate points, a passenger's 5G experience depends most on which carrier they use. The spread between the strongest and weakest carrier there is 8 to 11 dB.

AT&T is the strongest carrier across those 20 gate points. Each gate point is the area within 80 m of the gate, so these are gate-area counts, not building results.

Weakest-carrier tally across the 201 gate points

A gate counts for a carrier only when that carrier trails the next one by more than 1 dB. Anything closer counts as a tie.

Weakest carrier at the gate pointGate points (of 201)
Tie within 1 dB103
Verizon88
T-Mobile10
The five widest spreads
Gate (OpenStreetMap ref)ConcourseLowest reading this windowSpread
C7Concourse CT-Mobile10.9 dB
C6Concourse CT-Mobile9.5 dB
D11Concourse DVerizon9.4 dB
C9Concourse CT-Mobile9.3 dB
T1Concourse TT-Mobile8.9 dB

Spread is the strongest minus the weakest carrier's 5G RSRP at the gate point. Only gate points where every carrier has at least 30 tiles are included.

These gate points do two jobs. They are the worst-case examples for the stakeholder narrative. They are also the validation points for post-deployment monitoring (section 14).

An in-building system that carries 5G for all three carriers would be expected to narrow these spreads.

Fig. 32 · Top 20 gate points by carrier-to-carrier 5G spreadSource · Ookla
Horizontal bar chart of the 20 gate points with the largest best-minus-worst carrier 5G RSRP spread, led by gate C7; each bar is colored by the weakest carrier at that gate

FIG. 32. Top 20 gate points by best-minus-worst carrier 5G RSRP spread, among the 201 gate points where every carrier's per-gate n is at least 30 tiles. Bar color is the worst carrier at that gate. Gate refs follow the OpenStreetMap inventory. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

Fig. 33 · Weakest-carrier 5G class per tile, with device densitySource · Ookla
Two stacked terminal-area maps: the top colors each tile by the weakest carrier's 5G coverage class, amber over the apron between the piers and the landside terminals and green along the pier interiors; the bottom shows devices per usage tile on a log color scale, brightest along the concourse centres and the Domestic Terminal

FIG. 33. Top: each terminal-area tile colored by the worst carrier's 5G NR class where all three carriers report. Bottom: User_Density per usage tile (unique devices, deduplicated) on a log scale over the same extent. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile export and All Networks usage export, 2025-09-01 to 2026-08-31.

FIG. 33 answers two questions an operator asks first: where is the weakest carrier weak, and where are the devices?

Amber covers the apron between the piers and both landside terminals. Green runs along the pier interiors. The density panel shows the concourse centres and the Domestic Terminal with the highest device counts per tile.

Section 11

Federal and operational-critical tenants

Single-point aggregates · scope only · not ranked

5 operational-critical points are identifiable by name in the pinned capture: three fire stations and two United States Postal Service points.

No other federal or operational-critical point is identifiable by name. The Customs and Border Protection hall inside the International Terminal is not a mapped point.

AT&T's FirstNet Band 14 (LTE700PS) appears on 2,085 AT&T LTE tiles (section 9.1). Public-safety coverage posture is a section 15 layer.

PointZoneAT&T 5G RSRPT-Mobile 5G RSRPVerizon 5G RSRP
Atlanta Fire Rescue Station 35outside zones−70.0 dBm · n=12 · below the 30-tile floor, no class−90.9 dBm · healthy · n=30−93.3 dBm · n=12 · below the 30-tile floor, no class
Atlanta Fire Station 40outside zones−110.5 dBm · n=5 · below the 30-tile floor, no class−94.7 dBm · n=4 · below the 30-tile floor, no class−91.6 dBm · n=11 · below the 30-tile floor, no class
Atlanta Station 24 Fire Stationoutside zones−88.0 dBm · n=19 · below the 30-tile floor, no class−94.3 dBm · healthy · n=30−99.6 dBm · at-risk · n=69
United States Postal Serviceoutside zones−100.0 dBm · n=3 · below the 30-tile floor, no class−98.2 dBm · n=6 · below the 30-tile floor, no class−99.9 dBm · n=8 · below the 30-tile floor, no class
United States Postal Serviceoutside zones−103.3 dBm · n=12 · below the 30-tile floor, no class−97.2 dBm · n=12 · below the 30-tile floor, no class−100.2 dBm · n=15 · below the 30-tile floor, no class

n = tiles within 80 m of the point. A class is assigned only where a carrier has at least 30 tiles. Smaller cells are shown as readings with n visible.

Scope only, not a coverage assessment

Each row is a single-point aggregate of crowdsourced tiles. The rows are reported for scope and are not ranked. Recommendation 6 asks for a walk test at the fire stations.

Photo · Maynard H. Jackson Jr. International Terminal check-in hall, August 2024Wikimedia Commons
Interior of the Maynard H. Jackson Jr. International Terminal check-in hall, a wide hall with rows of check-in counters, overhead airline signage and a high ceiling

Maynard H. Jackson Jr. International Terminal check-in hall, August 2024. Photo: Vmzp85, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Illustrative, resized only.

Section 12

Share of gate points below the healthy line, and why passenger exposure is not derivable

Gate-area counts · exposure proxy not tabulated

In this window, most gate points sit below the healthy 5G line for T-Mobile and Verizon, and about a third do for AT&T.

A gate point is the area within 80 m of the gate. Healthy means 5G reference signal received power (RSRP) at or above −95 dBm. The last column shows how many of those gate points sit within 1 dB of the line, where a small change would move them across it.

These counts are conditional on a tile reporting 5G at all. AT&T reports 5G on 40% of its tiles, T-Mobile on 84% and Verizon on 70% (section 3).

CarrierGate points below healthy 5GShare of gate pointsWithin 1 dB of the line (sensitivity)
AT&T68 of 20133.8%60
T-Mobile170 of 20184.6%72
Verizon189 of 20194.0%34
Why this report does not convert gate points into passengers

Per-gate passenger volumes are not held. Two annual totals are held, and they measure different things:

FigureValueSource
Revenue enplanements, calendar 202452,511,402FAA held
Total passengers, 2025 (both directions)106,302,208Airport monthly traffic report held

The two bases are not interchangeable. Only the FAA enplanement figure belongs in any translation.

Illustrative proxy, kept in prose

Spreading annual enplanements evenly across the 201 measured gate points would put the same share of enplanements below healthy 5G as the share of gate points. It is not a measurement. It gives every gate the same volume regardless of airline, so it is not tabulated.

A gate-level passenger feed (section 15) would replace it. The gate-point shares in this section's table stand without it.

Section 13

Prioritized recommendations

Ordered by dependency · each with an owner

Seven asks, ordered by dependency. Each is a record, a re-measurement or a walk test.

No capital recommendation from this instrument alone

Crowdsourced tiles show where signal is weak and for whom. They do not size a system, price it, or tie a reading to a system.

  1. Obtain the in-building record the public sources do not hold

    Ask for these items:

    The integrator and equipment vendor of the replacement system. The City Council file for the May 19, 2025 carrier agreements.

    Verizon's participation in the new system. Verizon is not named in the 2025 release. It was on the 2010 system.

    The actual per-building cutover dates against the January 2026 target, and which buildings were live on the new system during this window.

    The International Terminal and Concourse F cellular architecture. The airport's technology leadership described it in November 2025 as different from the rest of the campus.

    For each of AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon: which bands (LTE, 5G NR) ride on the in-building system in each of the nine passenger buildings. The record also needs the power levels and the hand-off setup to the macro layer at the jet bridge.

    Why it comes first: two carriers sit below the healthy line at nearly every gate area. Site Finder places their nodes inside the piers (section 9.3). More than one explanation fits that pattern. The record decides which.

    Owner · City of Atlanta Department of Aviation with the in-building system operator and the three carriers
  2. Adopt this window as the baseline and re-measure per building

    Section 14 lists the per-carrier, per-building criteria. Start with the 5 lowest carrier-building cells over the building footprints (section 4.7):

    CarrierBuildingHealthy 5GTiles (n)
    T-MobileInternational Terminal27%60
    VerizonConcourse F36%166
    T-MobileConcourse F38%217
    AT&TInternational Terminal49%49
    T-MobileConcourse E50%464

    Four of these cells are below half. T-Mobile over Concourse E prints as 50% and is above half before rounding. That is why Concourse E counts among the 7 of 9 buildings where every carrier is healthy on more than half the tiles.

    The zone basis is weighted toward the apron, so it answers a different question: signal over the apron around the gates. Its lowest cells are re-measured as apron cells, not as buildings:

    CarrierZone (apron-weighted)Healthy 5GTiles (n)
    VerizonConcourse D zone25%1,361
    T-MobileConcourse D zone29%1,548
    T-MobileConcourse E zone29%2,595
    Owner · Imagine Wireless with the Department of Aviation
  3. Re-measure Concourse F and the International Terminal first, for all three carriers

    Each carrier's single lowest building is one of these two. For AT&T it is the International Terminal (49%), for T-Mobile the International Terminal (27%) and for Verizon Concourse F (36%). They are also where an arriving international passenger first turns a handset on.

    BuildingAT&T healthyT-Mobile healthyVerizon healthy
    Concourse F55%38%36%
    International Terminal49%27%61%

    Re-measure against the section 14 criteria, which are monitoring targets, not acceptance criteria.

    Owner · Department of Aviation with the in-building system operator and AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon
  4. Walk-test T-Mobile and Verizon 5G inside two piers

    Use one pier where all three carriers tie over the footprint (Concourse B) and one where AT&T leads (Concourse C).

    Walk from the concourse centre to the gate hold room and onto the jet bridge. That measures the building-versus-apron gap in section 4.7 instead of inferring it.

    Owner · Imagine Wireless with the two carriers
  5. Treat Wi-Fi as a capacity layer that coexists with cellular

    41.7% of observed data volume in the concourse zones rides Wi-Fi (section 7.1). That figure blends the public network with tenant, lounge, hotel and personal Wi-Fi, so it is not attributable to any one network.

    Obtain controller telemetry for the public network to size it. Section 5.6 gives the tenant-side reason.

    Owner · City of Atlanta Department of Aviation, Wi-Fi operator
  6. Verify public-safety coverage at the fire stations by walk test

    Atlanta Fire Rescue Station 35, Atlanta Fire Station 40 and Atlanta Station 24 Fire Station are mapped points. The section 11 readings are single-point crowdsourced aggregates, not a coverage assessment.

    Confirm the FirstNet Band 14 posture inside the piers. Emergency responder radio coverage is governed by the authority having jurisdiction and NFPA 1221, not by this instrument.

    Owner · Department of Aviation with Atlanta Fire Rescue, the Atlanta Police Department Airport Section and the authority having jurisdiction
  7. Decide the CBRS and private-wireless question with the in-building program

    Decide it alongside the in-building program (section 8), not after it. Keep the Concourse D construction phases in view.

    Owner · City of Atlanta Department of Aviation
Section 14

Post-deployment monitoring criteria and re-measurement plan

Indicative · baseline-and-after · locked ladder

This window is the baseline. After any in-building change, re-measure with the same instrument and compare each building against the numbers below.

Indicative monitoring criteria, not acceptance criteria

These criteria are indicative and not contractual. They are not the acceptance test for any system. Do not write them into a carrier agreement or a DAS acceptance document. Acceptance is per-carrier commissioning by walk test and scanner survey.

Every threshold is the locked ladder from section 16: healthy means −95.0 dBm or better. This report sets no target share. A target depends on the design, and on window-to-window variation that a single window cannot estimate.

Over the building footprints: the criteria that apply

Criterion for each building and carrier: the median over the footprint at or above −95.0 dBm, and the healthy share compared against this window's baseline. Re-test over a like-for-like window after that building's change.

Building (OSM footprint)AT&TT-MobileVerizon
Domestic Terminal−95.0 dBm · 54% (n=354)−95.0 dBm · 56% (n=440)−94.0 dBm · 55% (n=378)
Concourse T−92.0 dBm · 70% (n=203)−93.0 dBm · 70% (n=256)−91.0 dBm · 71% (n=217)
Concourse A−91.0 dBm · 81% (n=177)−89.0 dBm · 87% (n=222)−91.0 dBm · 71% (n=211)
Concourse B−91.0 dBm · 72% (n=181)−92.0 dBm · 74% (n=228)−91.5 dBm · 71% (n=208)
Concourse C−87.0 dBm · 89% (n=166)−92.0 dBm · 80% (n=211)−91.5 dBm · 65% (n=196)
Concourse D−88.0 dBm · 87% (n=119)−93.0 dBm · 60% (n=150)−90.5 dBm · 77% (n=142)
Concourse E−92.0 dBm · 69% (n=339)−95.0 dBm · 50% (n=464)−95.0 dBm · 53% (n=379)
Concourse F−94.0 dBm · 55% (n=157)−97.0 dBm · 38% (n=217)−99.0 dBm · 36% (n=166)
International Terminal−96.0 dBm · 49% (n=49)−97.0 dBm · 27% (n=60)−93.0 dBm · 61% (n=59)

Each cell: this window's median 5G RSRP over the footprint · healthy share (n = tiles over the footprint). Building basis: tiles whose centroid falls inside a pinned OSM passenger-building footprint.

At the gate areas: baseline counts

Criterion: the healthy 5G share of all measured gate points rises above this window's baseline. No target share is set. Re-test over a like-for-like window.

BasisAT&TT-MobileVerizon
Healthy 5G gate points (baseline)66% (133 of 201)15% (31 of 201)6% (12 of 201)
Concourse zones: apron-weighted context, not building criteria

Each zone pools the tiles nearest its gates, which are mostly apron. Compare the zone tile median and healthy share against this window's values after the concourse's in-building change.

Zone (apron-weighted context)AT&TT-MobileVerizon
Concourse T zone−95.0 dBm · 52% (n=2,518)−97.0 dBm · 41% (n=4,995)−99.0 dBm · 33% (n=3,403)
Concourse A zone−96.0 dBm · 49% (n=612)−98.0 dBm · 36% (n=1,696)−100.0 dBm · 32% (n=1,535)
Concourse B zone−96.0 dBm · 50% (n=539)−100.0 dBm · 31% (n=1,829)−100.0 dBm · 31% (n=1,554)
Concourse C zone−93.0 dBm · 59% (n=387)−99.0 dBm · 36% (n=1,514)−100.0 dBm · 31% (n=1,259)
Concourse D zone−94.0 dBm · 55% (n=440)−99.0 dBm · 29% (n=1,548)−102.0 dBm · 25% (n=1,361)
Concourse E zone−95.0 dBm · 52% (n=845)−99.0 dBm · 29% (n=2,595)−100.0 dBm · 29% (n=2,068)
Concourse F zone−99.0 dBm · 36% (n=1,107)−97.0 dBm · 42% (n=3,283)−93.0 dBm · 57% (n=1,895)

Each cell: this window's zone tile median 5G RSRP · healthy share (n = tiles in the zone).

No row is a per-gate apron threshold. The area within 80 m of a gate is mostly apron (section 16), and an in-building system is not built to meet an apron reading.

Validation gate points: carrier-to-carrier spread

Use the five widest spreads in section 10 (gates C7, C6, D11, C9 and T1) as the validation gate points. Compare each spread against this window's value. A multi-carrier in-building source should narrow it. Re-test over a like-for-like window.

Gate inventory behind the gate-named criteria

Gate refs and counts come from the OpenStreetMap inventory. Reconcile gate-named criteria against the Department of Aviation's gate plan before adopting them.

ConcourseTABCDEF
Gate points (OpenStreetMap)21293234413212

The airport fact sheet publishes 155 domestic and 43 international gates, 198 in all, with no per-concourse count held. The official 2012 International Terminal map publishes gates F1 to F14 for Concourse F.

The Concourse D widening program adds and retires gate positions through 2029. A published per-concourse count for this window is not held.

How re-measurement works

Use the same instrument as this baseline: Ookla Cell Analytics, with identical thresholds. Match the window: the same 12-month length, or a shorter matched window disclosed with the result.

Ookla's date-range comparison renders the before and after directly. Imagine Wireless re-measures after any in-building change goes live. The crowdsourced tiles give the before-and-after comparison. Acceptance itself is per-carrier commissioning.

Section 15

Next layers to add

Queued for the next revision

Each layer below answers a question this issue cannot. Most of them come from the airport, the carriers or an Ookla portal pull.

LayerWhat it resolvesSource
In-building system recordThe items section 8 lists as not held, plus the per-building, per-carrier band and power plan and the jet-bridge hand-off design (Recommendation 1)City of Atlanta Department of Aviation, in-building system operator
Imagine knowledge-graph contractsThe graph's contracts query was not available at this issue. The DAS master, deployment and leadership rows are pinned and quoted (section 2).Imagine knowledge graph
Indoor maskThe OSM building-polygon mask shipped in this issue (section 4.7). The Ookla native Indoor layer is to be pinned as portal captures.Ookla portal captures (Imagine Wireless)
Date-range comparisonBefore and after for each building as the in-building layer changes. Turns this snapshot into a trend.Ookla portal pull
Poor multi-network coverageVendor-ranked split between building problems and carrier problems. Corroborates section 4.3.Ookla portal pull
3D Z-axis view15 m vertical bands. The export is flat but the portal is not, and the Plane Train runs a level below the concourses.Ookla portal pull
Per-gate passenger countsReplaces the section 12 uniform-distribution proxy with measured exposureDepartment of Aviation, airline schedules
Gate plan reconciliationAligns OpenStreetMap gate refs with the Department of Aviation's gate list and the Concourse D construction phases before gate-named criteria are adoptedCity of Atlanta Department of Aviation
Wi-Fi controller telemetryAirtime, retries and client density. Turns presence into capacity.Wi-Fi operator, Department of Aviation
Public-safety (NFPA 1221) coverageEmergency responder radio coverage posture. FirstNet Band 14 is present in the data.Authority having jurisdiction, integrator
Throughput and latency seriesThe Speedtest series per concourse and per carrier would pair throughput with the signal readings in this report, which carries neitherOokla portal pull (Imagine Wireless)
Walk test: jet bridges, Plane Train tunnel, baggage corridors, construction zonesAreas crowdsourced data cannot reach. This is the acceptance instrument.Scanner survey
Section 16

Method, thresholds, confidence, and caveats

Thresholds · provenance · reproducibility

Every number on this page comes from Ookla crowdsourced tile data for a 12-month window, joined to mapped gates, tenants and buildings. This section states how, and what the data cannot show.

Nothing here is measured indoors

There is no indoor mask beyond the building-polygon selection, and no Z-axis. A gate value is the tiles within 80 m of a gate point, which straddle the apron on both sides of a pier.

Only a median of 22.4% of that area sits over a building (highest 68%). That is why building and terminal leaders are named only on the building basis, and gate-area results are reported as counts.

Data and joins
RuleValue
Measurement sourceOokla Cell Analytics per-carrier RF tile exports, the All Networks usage export and the Site Finder centroid workbooks for ATL. Window: 2025-09-01 through 2026-08-31 (12 months).
ClipThe KATL aerodrome polygon (OpenStreetMap way 208889095) plus a 200 m buffer, intersected with the one export rectangle shared by all four tile files (latitude 33.6248 to 33.6556, longitude -84.4601 to -84.3901). The rectangle holds the whole terminal and concourse area. The buffer extends beyond it only over the south airfield and the north cargo apron, with no terminal and no gate in either strip.
Tiles retained85,763 carrier-tile observations on the airport (one per carrier per tile) from 135,967 exported. 44,155 usage tiles from 69,977.
Freshness21 days at issue, within the 90-day policy. The 90-day policy is Imagine Wireless's reporting policy.
Tile geometryEach RF tile is 0.0001° by 0.0001°, about 9 m by 11 m at 33.6° N. The three carrier panels cover 44,634 unique tile centroids on the airport; 15,063 are seen by all three carriers.
What n countsThe export carries no per-tile scan count, so every n counts tiles, not scans. The 30-tile floor guards spatial support, not scan volume. Ookla aggregates each tile from its panel over the window.
Gates201 gate points from a pinned OpenStreetMap inventory. The concourse letter in each ref sets the zone, and a ref must carry a digit. The build checks every gate against the pinned concourse footprint, with a 150 m nearest-footprint fallback, and fails on any disagreement. Reconcile gate-named criteria against the Department of Aviation's gate plan before adoption (section 14).
Tenants284 points after hygiene, from a Google Places and OpenStreetMap capture pinned 2026-09-21. Points only: no polygons, no Z-axis.
Joins and zonesTiles join to gate and tenant points within an 80 m radius. Tiles are assigned to a zone by the nearest gate or tenant point within 500 m (disclosed proxy). A tenant's zone is the concourse footprint it sits in, else the concourse of the nearest lettered gate within 400 m (disclosed proxy).
Building maskPoint-in-polygon of tile centroids against the nine pinned OSM passenger-building footprints (section 4.7). It selects tiles over a building, not tiles measured inside it.
Site FinderOne LTE and one 5G workbook, deduplicated on technology, network, node id and position. Centroids are Ookla's estimated positions.
MapsEquirectangular axes in degrees, north up, no basemap tiles, rebuilt from the pinned CSVs.
Central tendencyMedian for every headline figure. Means only where labeled.
Carrier names and orderThe export's AT&T US, T-Mobile US and Verizon operators are printed as AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon. Order is strongest at the gates first: AT&T, then T-Mobile and Verizon, which are tied at the gate median only. The build asserts this order against the data.
Thresholds
MetricHealthyAt riskCritical
5G NR SS-RSRP and LTE RSRP≥ −95 dBm−95 to −110 dBm< −110 dBm
5G SS-SINR≥ 10 dB0 to 10 dB< 0 dB
RSRQ≥ −10 dB

One locked ladder applies everywhere. No venue-specified threshold was provided.

Noise floor. A margin under 1 dB is not a ranking. Every rank statement prints its margin. The T-Mobile-to-Verizon gate-median margin of 0.9 dB is reported as a tie. The tie is at the median only. Verizon is the weakest carrier by more than 1 dB at 88 gate points, and T-Mobile at 10 (section 10).

Minimum sample. No chart or comparative claim ships on fewer than 30 tiles or points. Concourses B, C, D and E clear the gate floor. Concourse T (21), Concourse A (29) and Concourse F (12) do not. Most tenant categories hold fewer than 30 points. Those tallies appear as counts with n visible and are not ranked. Zone, terminal, building and category comparisons run on the tile basis.

Units and inference limits

User_Density is the count of unique Android devices seen in a tile over the window, deduplicated. It does not count simultaneous users or time spent. A zone sum of it is device-tile observations.

Wi-Fi offload = Σ Wi-Fi MB ÷ Σ (Wi-Fi + Mobile) MB by volume, at venue and zone level only, on the All Networks panel. It cannot separate the public network from tenant or personal networks. Per-carrier offload is not derivable from this dataset and is not implied.

The panel. Background scans from consumer Android handsets, which Ookla puts at about 3% of devices. iOS devices are not sampled. Panel makeup differs by carrier, so cross-carrier comparisons carry a device-population bias the export cannot correct.

SupportedNot supported
Medians, shares and distributions at venue, zone, gate-cluster, building and tenant-category level, with n disclosedThroughput, latency or jitter (not in this export); per-carrier Wi-Fi offload; sub-tile positioning; floor separation

The passenger-journey and tenant readings in sections 4.8 and 5.6 are interpretations of the same aggregates, and are labelled as such.

Caveats

The data is weighted toward gate areas and public corridors. It does not cover jet-bridge interiors, the Plane Train tunnel or baggage corridors.

PCI diversity, serving-cell volatility, band distributions and Site Finder positions are aggregate proxies or estimates. They are not active traces, registry data or carrier network-management data. The optimization priority index is Ookla's vendor-defined layer. Inferences about cause are labeled as inferences.

Population key

One carrier can show several n on this page. This table shows which population each one counts. Cell, PCI and band fields are smaller still (next table).

PopulationAT&TT-MobileVerizon
All on-airport tiles25,82332,99226,948
Tiles inside the terminal extent drawn on the maps13,95117,37015,081
5G-reporting tiles10,31627,86018,800
5G-reporting tiles inside the map extent5,50614,76411,229
Field population

Cell, PCI and band fields fill only where Ookla resolved a serving cell. Their n is smaller than the RSRP n for the same carrier. The table shows how many on-airport tiles fill each field.

FieldAT&TT-MobileVerizon
NR_SS_RSRP10,31627,86018,800
NR_Strongest_Cell2,22326,0169,964
NR_Strongest_PCI2,22326,0219,963
NR_Strongest_Band2,22326,0219,964
LTE_RSRP24,68721,27523,342
LTE_Strongest_Cell24,70921,41223,371
LTE_CQI6,2617,4207,254
Optimization_Priority22,02616,92421,171
General_LTE_Service19,86125,56122,947
All on-airport tiles25,82332,99226,948
Confidence tags
TagMeaning
heldAn entity fact whose source document is pinned in this build and checksummed in the verification bundle. A held fact, never a measurement.
not independently verifiedA public record this build cites without holding a copy.
Imagine knowledge graphQuoted from the Imagine knowledge-graph snapshot pinned in the build's source folder. The graph's contracts query was not available at this issue. Its leadership rows are held without names.
Untagged numbersMeasured. Computed from the Ookla exports at build time and reproducible from the raw exports through the audit dossier.

The audit dossier also records capture dates for transcribed values (concourse airline assignments) and the public source behind every entity statement. No value is estimated or invented.

Terms
TermMeaning
5G NRThe 5G New Radio air interface
SS-RSRPSynchronization-signal reference-signal received power: the 5G signal level, in dBm
RSRPLTE reference-signal received power
SINRSignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio, in dB
RSRQReference-signal received quality
p90, p95The 90th and 95th percentiles
OSMOpenStreetMap
DASDistributed antenna system
MARTAThe Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
NFPA 1221The National Fire Protection Association standard for emergency communications systems
Tie-awareA comparison that prints a tie whenever the margin is at or under the noise floor (1 dB, or 1 point of healthy share)
Leader rule (buildings)A carrier leads a building only when it is alone at the top on both the healthy share, by more than 1 point, and the median, by more than 1 dB. Otherwise every carrier within those margins of the top on either measure is tied. That is why Concourse B, with a 2-point share margin but a 0.5 dB median margin, is a three-way tie.
Building basisTiles whose centroid falls inside a pinned OSM passenger-building footprint
Apron-weighted gate basisThe area within 80 m of each gate point. Most of it is apron, not building (the callout at the top of this section).
C-bandMid-band 5G spectrum, labeled NR3700 in the export
PCIPhysical cell identity: the identifier a handset reads from the serving cell
Site Finder centroidOokla's estimate of where a serving node sits, computed from the same crowdsourced tiles. An estimate, not registry data.
Audit dossierThe claims ledger, methodology, provenance manifest, findings log and cold-read record that accompany this report and reproduce every measured number from the raw exports
Photo credits
PhotographAuthorLicenseDate
Domestic Terminal ticketing and check-in hallHarrison KeelyCC BY 4.02023-05-03
Aerial view over the airfieldZixed11CC02026-05-26
Plane Train in-car displayDiscoA340CC02023-12-27
Concourse T corridor at gate T10DiscoA340CC BY-SA 4.02023-12-27
Concourse A at gate A19DiscoA340CC BY-SA 4.02023-12-27
Concourse B, boarding queue at gate B21DiscoA340CC BY-SA 4.02023-12-27
Concourse C at gate C33DiscoA340CC BY-SA 4.02023-12-27
Concourse D gate D11 hold roomVmzp85CC BY-SA 4.02024-08-13
Concourse E, gates E1 to E12 signageDiscoA340CC BY-SA 4.02023-12-27
Concourse F central atriumHarrison KeelyCC BY 4.02023-05-03
MARTA Airport Station fare gatesElToAn123CC BY-SA 4.02024-06-26
Domestic Terminal baggage claim, carousel 8Vmzp85CC BY-SA 4.02024-08-13
Domestic Terminal South upper-level departures curbMccunicanoCC BY-SA 4.02025-10-22
Maynard H. Jackson Jr. International Terminal check-in hallVmzp85CC BY-SA 4.02024-08-13

All photographs via Wikimedia Commons, used unmodified except for resizing. Every photograph dates from 2023 or later. Photographs are illustrative material, not measurements.

Audit trail and appendices

Every measured value on this page comes from the sealed report. Its numbers compute from the pinned Ookla exports at build time and reproduce through the audit dossier that accompanies it.

Appendices A, B and C (lowest-reading mapped points per carrier, strongest-serving band tables per carrier, and the full gate table) are in the PDF report.

Download the full report with appendices (PDF · rev 1)
Imagine Wireless · Venue Network Intelligence
Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport · rev 1 · 2026-09-21
Powered by Ookla Cell Analytics
Confidential · prepared for City of Atlanta Department of Aviation stakeholder review